28.01.2023 Views

CENSIS white paper: Intellectual Property in Business

2023: This CENSIS white paper sets out to make the topic of IP more approachable, less intimidating and more manageable, offering experience-based advice and methods are are designed to help businesses structure their IP- related issues and makes the best of their IP. Covering: The role of IP, IP management during growth, IP strategy for expanding companies and corporates, Business IP Canvas - merging IP with your business model.

2023: This CENSIS white paper sets out to make the topic of IP more approachable, less intimidating and more manageable, offering experience-based advice and methods are are designed to help businesses structure their IP- related issues and makes the best of their IP.
Covering:
The role of IP, IP management during growth, IP strategy for expanding companies and corporates, Business IP Canvas - merging IP with your business model.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Intellectual</strong> <strong>Property</strong> <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess: IP basics, IP management, IP strategy<br />

IP Basics for Start-ups (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)<br />

4 IP ownership - Keep records<br />

of where ideas come from<br />

Allocation of IP ownership is a critical issue for every<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess (regardless of its maturity). Investors and<br />

buyers will always require ownership <strong>in</strong>formation –<br />

after all, they will pay only for assets that belong to<br />

the bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

Employment contracts<br />

Certa<strong>in</strong> rules regard<strong>in</strong>g ownership are set out <strong>in</strong> law.<br />

For example, <strong>in</strong> the UK, IP developed by an employee<br />

<strong>in</strong> the course of employment will usually belong to the<br />

employer. Although this is the typical legal position, it is<br />

advisable for the sake of clarity and certa<strong>in</strong>ty to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

an explicit clause <strong>in</strong> the employment contract (or <strong>in</strong> a<br />

separate agreement dur<strong>in</strong>g the onboard<strong>in</strong>g procedure).<br />

And s<strong>in</strong>ce directors are not necessarily considered as<br />

employees, it is also advisable to use directors’ service<br />

contracts and to <strong>in</strong>clude IP clauses <strong>in</strong> them. 11<br />

In terms of ownership, companies should also pay<br />

attention to:<br />

1 IP registration processes, e.g., <strong>in</strong> the US, patents must<br />

be assigned to a company. A company is not named<br />

as a patent owner <strong>in</strong> the document, only <strong>in</strong> the<br />

digital files visible <strong>in</strong> the USPTO system.<br />

2 IP acquisition from third parties such as web design,<br />

content design and brand<strong>in</strong>g suppliers. Copyright<br />

ownership could otherwise rema<strong>in</strong> with the content<br />

creators after delivery, thereby potentially restrict<strong>in</strong>g<br />

future use.<br />

3 Purchases made by <strong>in</strong>dividual employees, e.g.,<br />

doma<strong>in</strong> names. In such cases, a company should<br />

ensure transfer of ownership.<br />

4 Jo<strong>in</strong>t developments with other organisations<br />

(e.g., development documentation, IP ownership,<br />

exploitation rights). A company should be clear<br />

about its <strong>in</strong>tentions and <strong>in</strong>terests when jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g such<br />

projects, negotiate accord<strong>in</strong>gly and capture agreed<br />

terms <strong>in</strong> a collaboration and exploitation agreement.<br />

Once the project starts, it should document its own<br />

developments, e.g., track<strong>in</strong>g the work of employees<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the project.<br />

Background IP<br />

In the R&D context, background IP is pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

IP brought <strong>in</strong>to a project by a collaborat<strong>in</strong>g party.<br />

At the end of the project, if the background IP has<br />

been <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to new developments<br />

(the foreground IP) or is otherwise required to work<br />

the foreground results commercially, the party wish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to exploit the foreground must ensure it also has the<br />

rights to the relevant background IP. This can be done<br />

through an assignation or a licence, whichever is<br />

agreeable to those <strong>in</strong>volved and legally possible.<br />

The position is very similar <strong>in</strong> a start-up context. When<br />

part of the IP has been developed prior to the company<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g established – a common scenario for sp<strong>in</strong>outs<br />

from academia, research facilities or corporations – the<br />

funders should ensure that the relevant IP is licensed<br />

(preferably exclusively) or assigned (if possible) to the<br />

start-up <strong>in</strong> a written agreement.<br />

Start-up idea vs ‘day job’<br />

The situation can easily become complicated when<br />

company founders work on a new solution for a start-up<br />

when concurrently employed <strong>in</strong> a different organisation.<br />

In such situations, it is critical to draw a clear l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

between the time and efforts <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> the start-up<br />

technology and the work done <strong>in</strong> the ‘day job, carefully<br />

record<strong>in</strong>g the start-up work that has been done, the<br />

resources used and where the work was done.<br />

Even with this recorded, those clear l<strong>in</strong>es may still<br />

become blurred if the start-up technology and the<br />

day job happen to be <strong>in</strong> the same field of technology/<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess 12 . As expla<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong> most cases employees will<br />

be required, as part of their contract of employment, to<br />

sign an IP assignment clause (or a separate agreement);<br />

<strong>in</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g so, they assign to the employer ownership of<br />

ideas and solutions related to their role <strong>in</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

This could also apply to ideas developed outside the<br />

day job where the employee is us<strong>in</strong>g the same skills and<br />

know-how that their job requires of them. Furthermore,<br />

employment contracts often <strong>in</strong>clude a non-competition<br />

obligation – add<strong>in</strong>g fuel to the fire if a start-up idea<br />

overlaps with the day job.<br />

Take-home message: Make sure that your employment<br />

contract <strong>in</strong>cludes both confidentiality provisions and IP<br />

assignment clauses. As a practical tip, it should become<br />

second nature to def<strong>in</strong>e transfer of ownership or<br />

licens<strong>in</strong>g of IP rights solely <strong>in</strong> a written form.<br />

11<br />

There is an exception <strong>in</strong> the higher education sector, where academics reta<strong>in</strong> rights <strong>in</strong> their academic works, even if they are created as part of<br />

their employment. ‘Gett<strong>in</strong>g your IP <strong>in</strong> order: stay <strong>in</strong> control of ownership’ (P<strong>in</strong>sent Manson, 2 November 2020) accessed 2 December 2022.<br />

12<br />

Harroch (n1).<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!