26.12.2012 Views

Transocean Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report

Transocean Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report

Transocean Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>and</strong> the long-term impact of those upgrades on future marketability. A hypothetical one-year increase in the useful lives of all of our rigs<br />

would cause a decrease in our annual depreciation expense of approximately $280 million. A hypothetical one-year decrease would cause<br />

an increase in our annual depreciation expense of approximately $371 million.<br />

Impairment of long-lived assets—We review our property <strong>and</strong> equipment for impairment when events or changes in<br />

circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of our assets held <strong>and</strong> used may not be recoverable or when carrying amounts of assets<br />

held for sale exceed fair value less cost to sell. Potential impairment indicators include rapid declines in commodity prices <strong>and</strong> related<br />

market conditions, actual or expected declines in dayrates or utilization, cancellations of contracts or credit concerns of multiple customers.<br />

During periods of oversupply, we may idle or stack rigs for extended periods of time, which could be an indication that an asset group may<br />

be impaired since supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> are the key drivers of rig utilization <strong>and</strong> our ability to contract our rigs at economical rates. Our rigs<br />

are mobile units, equipped to operate in geographic regions throughout the world <strong>and</strong>, consequently, we may move rigs from an<br />

oversupplied market sector to a more lucrative <strong>and</strong> undersupplied market sector when it is economical to do so. Many of our contracts<br />

generally allow our customers to relocate our rigs from one geographic region to another, subject to certain conditions, <strong>and</strong> our customers<br />

utilize this capability to meet their worldwide drilling requirements. Accordingly, our rigs are considered to be interchangeable within<br />

classes or asset groups, <strong>and</strong> we evaluate impairment by asset group. We consider our asset groups to be Ultra-Deepwater Floaters,<br />

Deepwater Floaters, Harsh Environment Floaters, Midwater Floaters, High-Specification Jackups, St<strong>and</strong>ard Jackups <strong>and</strong> Other Rigs.<br />

We assess recoverability of assets held <strong>and</strong> used by projecting undiscounted cash flows for the asset group being evaluated.<br />

When the carrying amount of the asset group is determined to be unrecoverable, we recognize an impairment loss, measured as the<br />

amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its estimated fair value. The evaluation requires us to make judgments<br />

about long-term projections for future revenues <strong>and</strong> costs, dayrates, rig utilization <strong>and</strong> idle time. These projections involve uncertainties<br />

that rely on assumptions about dem<strong>and</strong> for our services, future market conditions <strong>and</strong> technological developments. Significant <strong>and</strong><br />

unanticipated changes to these assumptions could materially alter an outcome that could otherwise result in an impairment loss. Given the<br />

nature of these evaluations <strong>and</strong> their application to specific asset groups <strong>and</strong> specific time periods, it is not possible to reasonably quantify<br />

the impact of changes in these assumptions.<br />

Pension <strong>and</strong> other postretirement benefits—We use a January 1 measurement date for net periodic benefit costs <strong>and</strong> a<br />

December 31 measurement date for projected benefit obligations <strong>and</strong> plan assets. We measure our pension liabilities <strong>and</strong> related net<br />

periodic benefit costs using actuarial assumptions based on a market-related valuation of assets that reduces year-to-year volatility. In<br />

applying this approach, we recognize investment gains or losses over a five-year period beginning with the year in which they occur.<br />

Investment gains or losses for this purpose are measured as the difference between the expected <strong>and</strong> actual returns calculated using the<br />

market-related value of assets. Actual results may differ from these measurements under different conditions or assumptions. Future<br />

changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates <strong>and</strong> various other factors related to the pension plans will impact our future pension<br />

obligations <strong>and</strong> net periodic benefit costs.<br />

Additionally, the pension obligations <strong>and</strong> related net periodic benefit costs for our defined benefit pension <strong>and</strong> other<br />

postretirement benefit plans, including retiree life insurance <strong>and</strong> medical benefits, are actuarially determined <strong>and</strong> are affected by<br />

assumptions, including long-term rate of return, discount rates, compensation increases, employee turnover rates <strong>and</strong> health care cost<br />

trend rates. The two most critical assumptions are the long-term rate of return <strong>and</strong> the discount rate. We periodically evaluate our<br />

assumptions <strong>and</strong>, when appropriate, adjust the recorded liabilities <strong>and</strong> expense. Changes in these <strong>and</strong> other assumptions used in the<br />

actuarial computations could impact our projected benefit obligations, pension liabilities, net periodic benefit costs <strong>and</strong> other<br />

comprehensive income. See “�Retirement Pension Plans <strong>and</strong> Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.”<br />

Long-term rate of return—We develop our assumptions regarding the estimated rate of return on plan assets based on historical<br />

experience <strong>and</strong> projected long-term investment returns, considering each plan’s target asset allocation <strong>and</strong> long-term asset class expected<br />

returns. We regularly review our actual asset allocation <strong>and</strong> periodically rebalance plan assets as appropriate. For each percentage point<br />

the expected long-term rate of return assumption is lowered, pension expense would increase by approximately $11 million.<br />

Discount rate—As a basis for determining the discount rate, we utilize a yield curve approach based on Aa-rated corporate<br />

bonds <strong>and</strong> the expected timing of future benefit payments. For each one-half percentage point the discount rate is lowered, net periodic<br />

benefit costs would increase by approximately $18 million.<br />

Contingent liabilities—We establish liabilities for estimated loss contingencies when we believe a loss is probable <strong>and</strong> the<br />

amount of the probable loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, we adjust the carrying amount of a contingent liability upon<br />

the occurrence of a recognizable event when facts <strong>and</strong> circumstances change, altering our previous assumptions with respect to the<br />

likelihood or amount of loss.<br />

New Accounting Pronouncements<br />

For a discussion of the new accounting pronouncements that have had or are expected to have an effect on our consolidated<br />

financial statements, see Notes to Consolidated Financial <strong>Statement</strong>s—Note 3—New Accounting Pronouncements.<br />

AR-65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!