Transocean Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report
Transocean Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report
Transocean Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Peer Group <strong>and</strong> Competitive Positioning<br />
Peer Group<br />
We compete for executive talent across many different sectors around the world. Our primary<br />
competitive market generally includes other companies in the energy industry (oil <strong>and</strong> gas companies,<br />
offshore drilling companies <strong>and</strong> other energy services companies). In making compensation decisions for<br />
the Named Executive Officers, each element of their total direct compensation is compared against<br />
published compensation data.<br />
For <strong>2010</strong>, we used a group of peer companies to compare each component of our executive<br />
compensation program to the competitive marketplace. This group (the ‘‘Peer Group’’) was comprised of<br />
the following companies:<br />
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Hess Corporation<br />
Apache Corporation Marathon Oil Corporation<br />
Baker Hughes Incorporated National-Oilwell Varco Inc.<br />
Devon Energy Corporation Noble Corporation<br />
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. Pride International, Inc.<br />
ENSCO plc Rowan Companies Inc.<br />
EOG Resources, Inc. Schlumberger Limited<br />
Halliburton Company Weatherford International Ltd.<br />
The Peer Group or a smaller group may be used for performance comparisons as determined by the<br />
Committee. In August <strong>2010</strong>, the Committee removed Smith International, Inc. from the Peer Group due<br />
to Smith International, Inc.’s merger with Schlumberger Limited.<br />
Competitive Positioning<br />
Generally, we set the target compensation for our executive officers, including the Named Executive<br />
Officers, at the market median to remain competitive <strong>and</strong> avoid contributing to the ‘‘ratcheting-up’’ of<br />
executive compensation that occurs when a large number of companies all target their executive<br />
compensation at above-median levels. In <strong>2010</strong>, we determined the market median based on data from the<br />
Peer Group <strong>and</strong> market surveys analyzed by the compensation consultant, each weighted at 50%.<br />
Our approach to setting executive compensation, which is periodically reviewed <strong>and</strong> updated by the<br />
Committee, is as follows:<br />
Element Targeted Position Comments<br />
Base Salary Market median. Individual circumstances can allow for<br />
certain positions to be above or below the<br />
median.<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> Bonus Opportunity to earn total Actual payout based on performance.<br />
cash compensation Metrics include both financial <strong>and</strong><br />
competitive with market, operational results that drive long-term<br />
with upside/downside value. Current award potential ranges from<br />
based on performance 0% to 200% of target.<br />
against financial <strong>and</strong><br />
operating metrics.<br />
P-40