Selwyn_Times: June 21, 2023
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Selwyn</strong> <strong>Times</strong> Wednesday <strong>June</strong> <strong>21</strong> <strong>2023</strong><br />
4<br />
NEWS<br />
Latest Canterbury news at starnews.co.nz<br />
Dodgy builder may have left mark<br />
• By Jeremy Wilkinson<br />
A BUILDER who swapped out<br />
consented roofing material for a<br />
Chinese product to save money<br />
was caught out when the paint<br />
began to deteriorate several<br />
years later.<br />
It is unclear how many homes<br />
may have been built in <strong>Selwyn</strong><br />
with the unconsented product.<br />
But evidence submitted to the<br />
Building Practitioners Board<br />
suggests it could be up to 60.<br />
The board found<br />
Christchurch-based builder<br />
Scott Lilly guilty of negligence<br />
and fined him $3000 after a<br />
complaint was made by the<br />
district council.<br />
The recently released decision<br />
said Lilly substituted consented<br />
roofing material on a new<br />
house he was building with<br />
the product he imported from<br />
China, which was left over after<br />
building a shed on another<br />
property.<br />
There was no evidence the<br />
Chinese product met New Zealand’s<br />
building code standards.<br />
The district council issued<br />
a code of compliance for the<br />
house without knowing the<br />
MetalCraft product had been<br />
substituted with material from<br />
the Zibo Wangshun Building<br />
Materials Company. The house<br />
was then sold. The purchaser<br />
SOURCE: The Zibo Wangshun Building Materials Company was founded in China in 2006.<br />
PHOTO: ZBWANGSHUN.EN<br />
noticed deterioration in the roof<br />
paint and made a complaint<br />
about it, which led to a closer inspection<br />
by the district council<br />
into the actual roofing product<br />
that was used.<br />
Lilly didn’t respond to<br />
requests for comment. But when<br />
the district council initially<br />
confronted him about the<br />
issue, he claimed a roofer had<br />
both supplied and installed the<br />
product and all the roof needed<br />
was a repaint.<br />
He later admitted his<br />
company had supplied the<br />
product but claimed it met the<br />
New Zealand’s building code<br />
requirements. He provided<br />
correspondence which<br />
he claimed supported the<br />
Waimakariri District Council<br />
had assessed the product and<br />
said it was up to scratch. He also<br />
builds houses in that district.<br />
However, the board said the<br />
evidence Lilly supplied didn’t<br />
support his claim and it appeared<br />
the roofing iron’s thickness<br />
hadn’t been tested – meaning<br />
it didn’t meet the code.<br />
“Looking at the Zibo<br />
Wangshun product, it is not<br />
CodeMarked and there was no<br />
evidence that an appraisal had<br />
been carried out and<br />
accepted by the Building<br />
Consent Agency at the time it<br />
was used,” the board said in its<br />
decision.<br />
“It should also be noted that<br />
the burden of proving that a<br />
product meets building code<br />
requirements sits with the person<br />
who seeks to use it. As such,<br />
there was no basis on which the<br />
Zibo Wangshun product could<br />
be considered a comparable<br />
product.”<br />
The board said the<br />
correspondence Lilly provided<br />
was “at best an overstatement”<br />
and he appeared to have<br />
deliberately circumvented the<br />
building consent process.<br />
“The decision to substitute the<br />
roofing product was calculated<br />
and, on the face of it, appears to<br />
have been done to save money,”<br />
the board said.<br />
“The respondent’s failure was<br />
not inadvertence or carelessness.<br />
The conduct was deliberate, and<br />
it reached the threshold for the<br />
board to impose a disciplinary<br />
sanction.”<br />
The board went on to say<br />
Lilly’s attitude towards the<br />
consenting process was “reckless<br />
and dangerous” and went<br />
beyond negligence, putting the<br />
purpose of the Building Act at<br />
risk.<br />
“The respondent initially<br />
denied that he had supplied the<br />
roofing product. His approach<br />
to the matter was to deal with<br />
it as a commercial dispute,” the<br />
board said.<br />
“He focused on Consumer<br />
Guarantees Act rights and<br />
remedies and submitted that a<br />
repaint would suffice.<br />
“The respondent does not<br />
appear to have appreciated the<br />
impact of his conduct on those<br />
that have purchased the homes.”<br />
It was the second time Lilly<br />
has been before the board.<br />
He was found guilty in 2015<br />
of similarly violating the<br />
consenting process and fined<br />
$2000.<br />
Over 10 Years in <strong>Selwyn</strong><br />
Ruby Jones<br />
Kieran Heenan<br />
Anita Molloy-Roberts<br />
W: www.meareswilliams.co.nz<br />
T: (03) 374 2547<br />
E: rec@meareswilliams.co.nz<br />
PROSTATE CANCER<br />
SUPPORT GROUP<br />
A support group is operating in <strong>Selwyn</strong> for<br />
men and their families who are living with a<br />
diagnosis and treatment for Prostate Cancer.<br />
Coordinators Chris & dianne Ward<br />
Phone: 027 437 1254<br />
email: selwyn@prostate.org.nz<br />
Meeting<br />
WedneSdAy<br />
28 JUne<br />
7.30PM<br />
Lincoln event Centre,<br />
Meijer drive, Lincoln<br />
“diet and nutrition”<br />
- All welcome<br />
LINCOLN OFFICE<br />
43 Gerald Street, Lincoln<br />
Offices also located at:<br />
80A Rolleston Drive, Rolleston<br />
225 Papanui Road, Christchurch<br />
For more information call 0800 477 678<br />
Organised by the Prostate Cancer Foundation of New Zealand<br />
www.prostate.org.nz