The Impact of Technology Insertion on Organisations

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HFIDTC/2/12.2.1/1 Version 3 / 21 November 2007 [92] Aarons, G.A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption <strong>of</strong> evidence-based practice. <strong>The</strong> Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6, 61-74. [93] Aarons, G.A. (2005). Measuring provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice Organisational context and individual differences. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics <strong>of</strong> North America, 14, 255-271. [94] Glisson, C. and James, L. R. (2002). <strong>The</strong> cross-level effects <strong>of</strong> culture and climate in human service teams. Journal <strong>of</strong> Organisational Behavior, 23, 767-794. [95] Schoenwald, S.K., Letourneau, E.J., and Halliday-Boykins, C.A. (2004). <strong>The</strong>rapist and client predictors <strong>of</strong> adherence to an evidence-based treatment in community settings. Manuscript submitted for review. [96] Mahnken, T.G. (2001). Naval War College Review, Summer 2001, Vol. LIV, No. 3. [97] Donnelly, T. (2000). Revolution? What Revolution? Jane’s Defence Weekly, 7 June, 22–27. [98] Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. (1988). Managerial Influence in the Implementation <strong>of</strong> New <strong>Technology</strong>. Management Science, 34, 1252-1266. [99] Yin, R.K. (1977). Production efficiency versus bureaucratic self-interest: Two innovative processes? Policy Sciences, 8, 381-399. [100] Szulanski, G. (2000). <strong>The</strong> process <strong>of</strong> knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis <strong>of</strong> stickiness. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 9-27. [101] Barley, S.R. (1986). <strong>Technology</strong> as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations <strong>of</strong> CT scanners and the social order <strong>of</strong> radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78-108. [102] Attewell, P. (1992). <strong>Technology</strong> diffusion and organisational learning: <strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> business computing. Organisation Science, 3, 1-19. [103] Orlikowski, W.J. (1993). Learning from notes: Organisational issues in groupware implementation. Information Society, 9, 237-250. [104] Orlikowski, W.J (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organisations. Organisation Science, 11, 404-428. [105] Moreland, R.L. (1999). Learning who knows what in work groups and organisations. In L.L. Thompson, J.M. Levine, and D.M. Messick (eds.), Shared Cognition in Organisations: <strong>The</strong> Management <strong>of</strong> Knowledge: 3-32. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [106] Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Benyon, D. (1994). Human Computer Interaction. Wokingham, England, Reading. Addison-Wesley. [107] Lehr, W. and Lichtenberg, F.R. Computer Use and Productivity Growth in Federal Government Agencies 1987-92, Journal <strong>of</strong> Industrial Economics, 46, 257- 279. 73
HFIDTC/2/12.2.1/1 Version 3 / 21 November 2007 [108] Berger, W. (1999). Lost in space. Wired. [Online] Available from: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.02/chiat.html. [cited Dec 2006]. [109] Solow, R. <strong>The</strong> Productivity Paradox, Personal Communication, March 1990. [110] Strassman, P.A. (1997). <strong>The</strong> Squandered Computer: Evaluating the Business Alignment <strong>of</strong> Information Technologies. New Canadian, CT: Information Economics Press. [111] Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (2000). <strong>The</strong> Social Life <strong>of</strong> Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [112] Mukhopadhyay, T., Rajiv, S. and Srinivasan, K. (1997). Information <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> on Process Output and Quality, Management Science, 43: 1645-1659. [113] Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending. Management Science, April 1996. [114] Dewan, S. and Min, C.K. (1997). Substitution <strong>of</strong> Information <strong>Technology</strong> for Other Factors <strong>of</strong> Production: A Firm-level Analysis, Management Science 43, 1660- 1675. [115] Bharadwaj, A.S., Bharadwaj, S.G., and Konsynski, B.R. (1999) Information <strong>Technology</strong> Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's Q. Journal <strong>of</strong> Management Science. [116] Devaraj, S. and Kohli, R. (2000). IT Pay<strong>of</strong>f in the Health Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study. Journal <strong>of</strong> Management. Information Systems. [117] Sohal, A.S., Moss, S. and Ng, L. (2001). Comparing IT success in manufacturing and service industries. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations & Production Management. [118] David, P. (1990). <strong>The</strong> dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review, 80, 355-6 [119] Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, [120] Bias R.G., and Mayhew, D. J, Eds. (1994). Cost-Justifying Usability, Harcourt Brace & Co. Boston. [121] Osterman, P. (1986). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> Computers on the Employment <strong>of</strong> Clerks and Managers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 39, 175-186. [122] Morrison, C.J. and Berndt, E.R. (1990). Assessing the Productivity <strong>of</strong> Information <strong>Technology</strong> Equipment in the U.S. Manufacturing Industries. National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Research Working Paper #3582 (January, 1990). [123] CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES (1985). Automation <strong>of</strong> America’s Offices 1985/2000 (Washington DC: Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Assessment). In Eason, K. (2001) Changing perspectives on the organisational consequences <strong>of</strong> information technology. Behaviour & Information <strong>Technology</strong>. 20, 323-328. 74
Page 1 and 2:
The Impact
Page 3 and 4:
HFIDTC/2/12.2.1/1 Version 3 / 21 No
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28: HFIDTC/2/12.2.1/1 Version 3 / 21 No
Page 77: HFIDTC/2/12.2.1/1 Version 3 / 21 No
Page 87: HFIDTC/2/12.2.1/1 Version 3 / 21 No
show all

The Impact of Technology Insertion on Organisations

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?