06.01.2013 Views

NODULE X7 OSWALD IN MINSK AND THE U2 DUMP: JANUARY ...

NODULE X7 OSWALD IN MINSK AND THE U2 DUMP: JANUARY ...

NODULE X7 OSWALD IN MINSK AND THE U2 DUMP: JANUARY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Francis Gary Powers stated that when the KGB had scientists extrapolate his altitude<br />

from various radar readings, they happened to verify his arbitrary figure:<br />

As they read the figures, I began to disbelieve them. Surely this was some<br />

cruel hoax, designed to throw me off guard. No one could be so lucky. Not<br />

only was their height-finding radar off...some were actually at 68,000!<br />

During the show trial of Francis Gary Powers in Moscow in August 1960, the Soviets<br />

insisted they shot down the U-2 at its cruising altitude of 68,000 feet. Francis Gary<br />

Powers was asked repeatedly, "At what altitude was your aircraft struck?" and he<br />

answered, "It was the maximum altitude, 68,000 feet." Major Voronov, whose rocket unit<br />

shot down the U-2, testified: "As the plane entered the firing range at an altitude of<br />

68,000 feet one rocket was fired and its explosion destroyed the target." In 1978 the CIA<br />

claimed: "The Soviets knew perhaps even more accurately than even the U-2 altimeters<br />

showed, what the height was." [CIA OLC #78-2469 - SD Breckinridge meeting with<br />

HSCA investigators] The key to shooting down the U-2 was not so much in defeating its<br />

granger as it was having accurate information as to its cruising altitude. Francis Gary<br />

Powers tried to cover up the fact that he gave the Soviets accurate information about<br />

the altitude of the U-2. Francis Gary Powers had been instructed that "if captured be<br />

cooperative and try to answer questions to which the Soviets appeared already to have<br />

knowledge."<br />

Powers did not know it, but the Soviets already had knowledge of the altitude of the U-2<br />

from <strong>OSWALD</strong>. <strong>OSWALD</strong> had learned it at Atsugi or from ANGLETON. (The Soviets<br />

thought he had learned it while stationed at Atsugi). ANGLETON had sabotaged the<br />

Summit and changed history.<br />

<strong>OSWALD</strong>'S friend, Michael Paine, commented:<br />

I could well believe that he would give some information. That he'd like to<br />

be valuable to the Russians. He didn't feel a loyalty to the United States.<br />

He wanted to change the system here. If he had some information he<br />

thought he could sell, he might have done it. That's enough explanation. If<br />

he gave the Russians the information to sabotage the summit, it would<br />

have had to happen at the right instance. <strong>OSWALD</strong> wasn't what you called<br />

a 'world class' person. If I were recruiting somebody to do that, I would like<br />

someone with a little more mental acumen. He wasn't stupid, but neither<br />

was he smart. If I were trying to find someone for a role like that, I wouldn't<br />

have picked LEE.<br />

This researcher told Michael Paine that the most unrecognizable spy is the most<br />

dangerous. Michael Paine agreed, "Yeah, I'll go along with that. But <strong>OSWALD</strong> was<br />

pipsqueak."<br />

HEMM<strong>IN</strong>G told this researcher:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!