06.01.2013 Views

reSolution_LNT_No1_en - Leica Microsystems

reSolution_LNT_No1_en - Leica Microsystems

reSolution_LNT_No1_en - Leica Microsystems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BIOLOGY<br />

Fig. 2<br />

Fig. 1 & 2: Distribution and colocalization of<br />

GABA (B1) and Kir3.2 in d<strong>en</strong>drites of hippocampal<br />

cells as revealed by the SDS-digested freezefracture<br />

replica labeling technique. A, Immunoparticles<br />

for the GABA (B1) subunit were found<br />

in clusters (arrows) over the surface of d<strong>en</strong>dritic<br />

shaft (D<strong>en</strong>) and spine (s) of a putative pyramidal<br />

cell. B, C, Double and triple immunogold labeling<br />

for Kir3.2 (5 nm particles; double arrows), GABA<br />

(B1) (10 nm; arrows), and PSD-95 (15 nm in C)<br />

revealed that the two proteins co-clustered in<br />

d<strong>en</strong>dritic spines of pyramidal cells (B and C) and<br />

associated to the site of glutamatergic synapses<br />

indicated by immunoreactivity for PSD-95 (C).<br />

Scale bars, 200 nm<br />

4 reSOLUTION<br />

in order to facilitate proper p<strong>en</strong>etration.<br />

Silver int<strong>en</strong>sifi cation of the gold<br />

particles is subsequ<strong>en</strong>tly carried out<br />

to produce a detectable particle size.<br />

This method produces non-diffusible<br />

labels, thus the precise site of the reaction<br />

and the location of the protein<br />

at extra- and perisynaptic sites can be<br />

determined. Synaptic proteins, however,<br />

cannot be detected using this<br />

method, most likely due to the inaccessibility<br />

of the epitopes in the synaptic<br />

specializations of fi xed tissues 2 .<br />

(ii) The postembedding immunogold<br />

method overcomes the problems of<br />

pre-embedding technique by reacting<br />

immunochemicals with the antig<strong>en</strong>s<br />

exposed on the surface of the ultrathin<br />

sections and th<strong>en</strong> detecting synaptic<br />

proteins with the same s<strong>en</strong>sititvity as<br />

that for non-synaptic molecules. This<br />

also improves quantitative evaluation<br />

of the protein d<strong>en</strong>sities.<br />

However, in resin-embedded sections<br />

substantial proportions of proteins are<br />

buried and therefore not accessible<br />

for antibodies, limiting the detection<br />

s<strong>en</strong>sitivity of this technique 2 . (iii) In<br />

SDS-FRL, the brain tissue is froz<strong>en</strong><br />

with a high-pressure freezing machine (<strong>Leica</strong> EM HPM100)<br />

th<strong>en</strong> froz<strong>en</strong> samples are freeze-fractured in a replica machine<br />

(<strong>Leica</strong> EM BAF060). Proteins are allocated to either<br />

the protoplasmic faces (P-faces) or the exoplasmic faces<br />

(E-faces) of plasma membranes. Molecules are immobilized<br />

with a thin layer of carbon (3-5 nm) followed by a<br />

further coating with a 2-nm-thick platinum/carbon layer for<br />

shadowing the membrane faces and th<strong>en</strong> this material is<br />

str<strong>en</strong>gth<strong>en</strong>ed with a 15 – 20 nm thick carbon deposit 3 . The<br />

SDS-FRL technique has two major advantages compared to<br />

conv<strong>en</strong>tional immunogold methods.<br />

First, the s<strong>en</strong>sitivity of the SDS-FRL is considerably higher<br />

than that of the pre- and postembedding techniques, because<br />

membrane proteins are exposed on the two-dim<strong>en</strong>sional<br />

surface of the replica (Fig. 1), making them readily<br />

accessible to immunoreag<strong>en</strong>ts. In addition, epitopes are<br />

d<strong>en</strong>aturated by SDS, allowing antibodies known to be<br />

suitable for immunoblot analysis to react similarly with<br />

proteins immobilized on the replica membrane. Second,<br />

synaptic and extrasynaptic proteins can simultaneously<br />

be visualized and quantifi cation of immunogold d<strong>en</strong>sity in<br />

membrane segm<strong>en</strong>ts can be achieved.<br />

This immunocytochemical method, similarly to others, has<br />

limitations. First, the id<strong>en</strong>tifi cation of labeled morphological<br />

structures is diffi cult, therefore, it is necessary to use<br />

marker proteins to facilitate the id<strong>en</strong>tifi cation of fractured<br />

membranes 6 . Second, the separation of membrane proteins<br />

to P-face or E-face is unpredictable: some proteins are prefer<strong>en</strong>tially<br />

allocated to either the P-face, such as GABA (B1),<br />

Kir3.2 4 or the E-face, such as AMPA receptors 5 , whereas<br />

others, like gluRδ2 6 are localized to both faces. Thus, for<br />

quantitative studies, the allocation of the molecules should<br />

carefully be examined 7 .<br />

Tak<strong>en</strong> together, these three immunocytochemical techniques<br />

provide complem<strong>en</strong>tary information about the cellular<br />

and subcellular distribution of proteins and are widely<br />

used for high-resolution qualitative and quantitative analysis<br />

of receptor and ion channel localization and colocalization<br />

in post- and presynaptic compartm<strong>en</strong>ts of neurons.<br />

Contact<br />

Daniel Althof, Akos Kulik<br />

Departm<strong>en</strong>t of Anatomy and Cell Biology,<br />

Institute of Neuroanatomy, Spemann Graduate School of<br />

Biology and Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany<br />

Departm<strong>en</strong>t of Physiology II, University of Freiburg,<br />

Germany<br />

akos.kulik@physiologie.uni-freiburg.de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!