Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software
Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software
Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Draper 2007 (Continued)<br />
Bias Authors’ judgement Support <strong>for</strong> judgement<br />
Random sequence generation (selection<br />
bias)<br />
Low risk “Placing names into a hat and drawing out one at a time ...”<br />
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk “... and alternating between treatment or wait list control<br />
groups.”<br />
Blinding (per<strong>for</strong>mance bias and detection<br />
bias)<br />
All outcomes<br />
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)<br />
All outcomes<br />
Low risk “Questionnaires sent to the homes of the paired groups.”<br />
Unclear risk Description: immediate treatment group 2/19 (11%) missing at<br />
end of scheduled follow-up<br />
9/20 (45%) participants in wait list control group actively<br />
dropped out from further participation in trial<br />
Reason <strong>for</strong> missing data reported: no<br />
Missing data balanced between groups: no<br />
Statistical methods used to deal with missing data: none<br />
Judgement: no reasons <strong>for</strong> missing data provided/insufficient<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation to permit judgement<br />
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Description: selective omission of outcome from report<br />
Judgement: not all study’s pre-specified primary outcomes have<br />
been reported<br />
Grant 2002<br />
Methods RCT<br />
Participants Source: participants recruited from 1 private and 1 state rehabilitation facility, Birmingham,<br />
Alabama, USA<br />
Definition of caregiver: not stated<br />
Caregivers’ inclusion criteria: age ≥18; related to stroke survivor by blood or marriage;<br />
responsible <strong>for</strong> providing care to stroke survivor ≥ 6 hours per day; have sufficient use<br />
of English language to take part in telephone contacts; provided consent; contactable by<br />
telephone and lived within 100 mile radius of study centres<br />
Caregivers’ exclusion criteria: major history of debilitating diseases such as depression,<br />
schizophrenia or alcoholism as measured by standard diagnostic criteria<br />
Stroke survivors’ inclusion criteria: admitting diagnosis of ischaemic stroke either caused<br />
by thrombi or emboli; FIM score between 36 and 96; discharge destination of home<br />
Stroke survivors’ exclusion criteria: major history of debilitating diseases such as depression,<br />
schizophrenia or alcoholism as measured by standard diagnostic criteria<br />
Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> randomised: 74<br />
Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> in intervention group: unclear<br />
Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> in comparator group A: unclear<br />
Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> in comparator group B: unclear<br />
Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> assessed at final follow-up: 73<br />
<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>pharmacological</strong> <strong>interventions</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>caregivers</strong> of stroke survivors (Review)<br />
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
21