06.01.2013 Views

Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software

Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software

Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Draper 2007 (Continued)<br />

Bias Authors’ judgement Support <strong>for</strong> judgement<br />

Random sequence generation (selection<br />

bias)<br />

Low risk “Placing names into a hat and drawing out one at a time ...”<br />

Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk “... and alternating between treatment or wait list control<br />

groups.”<br />

Blinding (per<strong>for</strong>mance bias and detection<br />

bias)<br />

All outcomes<br />

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)<br />

All outcomes<br />

Low risk “Questionnaires sent to the homes of the paired groups.”<br />

Unclear risk Description: immediate treatment group 2/19 (11%) missing at<br />

end of scheduled follow-up<br />

9/20 (45%) participants in wait list control group actively<br />

dropped out from further participation in trial<br />

Reason <strong>for</strong> missing data reported: no<br />

Missing data balanced between groups: no<br />

Statistical methods used to deal with missing data: none<br />

Judgement: no reasons <strong>for</strong> missing data provided/insufficient<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation to permit judgement<br />

Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Description: selective omission of outcome from report<br />

Judgement: not all study’s pre-specified primary outcomes have<br />

been reported<br />

Grant 2002<br />

Methods RCT<br />

Participants Source: participants recruited from 1 private and 1 state rehabilitation facility, Birmingham,<br />

Alabama, USA<br />

Definition of caregiver: not stated<br />

Caregivers’ inclusion criteria: age ≥18; related to stroke survivor by blood or marriage;<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> providing care to stroke survivor ≥ 6 hours per day; have sufficient use<br />

of English language to take part in telephone contacts; provided consent; contactable by<br />

telephone and lived within 100 mile radius of study centres<br />

Caregivers’ exclusion criteria: major history of debilitating diseases such as depression,<br />

schizophrenia or alcoholism as measured by standard diagnostic criteria<br />

Stroke survivors’ inclusion criteria: admitting diagnosis of ischaemic stroke either caused<br />

by thrombi or emboli; FIM score between 36 and 96; discharge destination of home<br />

Stroke survivors’ exclusion criteria: major history of debilitating diseases such as depression,<br />

schizophrenia or alcoholism as measured by standard diagnostic criteria<br />

Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> randomised: 74<br />

Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> in intervention group: unclear<br />

Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> in comparator group A: unclear<br />

Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> in comparator group B: unclear<br />

Number of <strong>caregivers</strong> assessed at final follow-up: 73<br />

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>pharmacological</strong> <strong>interventions</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>caregivers</strong> of stroke survivors (Review)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!