Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory ...$

Markle-Reid 2007 (Continued) Participants Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of stroke has been confirmed through admission to an acute care hospital (defined as an acute focal neurological deficit caused by cerebrovascular disease); newly referred to an eligible for home care services (physiotherapy, speech language therapy, occupational therapy, nursing) through the Toronto CCAC, from acute care or in-patient stroke rehabilitation hospitals; living at home in the community (outside of an institutional setting) up to 18 months post-stroke Exclusion criteria: refuse to give informed consent; more than 18 months post-stroke at time of recruitment; unable to read/write English and an appropriate translator is not available; must be English-speaking Interventions Experimental: participants in the experimental group will receive home care services from a team of professional service providers (CCAC Care Co-ordinator, Registered Nurse, Occupational therapist, Physiotherapist, Speech language pathologist, Nutritionist) and non-professional service providers (personal support workers) with experience and training in stroke care. The team will provide a comprehensive, co-ordinated and evidence-based approach to stroke rehabilitation through weekly case conferencing, a written interdisciplinary care plan, and joint visits Control: no intervention Outcomes Primary outcome measures: SF-36 Health Survey Secondary outcome measures: Stroke Impact Scale - 16; Reintegration to Normal Living Index; Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; Centre for Epidemiological Studies in Depression Scale; Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale; Personal Resource Questionnaire; Health and Social Services Utilization Inventory; Kessler Starting date February 2006 Contact information Maureen Markle-Reid email: mreid@mcmaster.ca Notes Recruitment stopped but study ongoing as at 7 April 2010 Teel 2005 Trial name or title Promoting stroke caregiver health vis self care TALK: education and support telephone partnerships with nurses Methods A randomised, treatment/comparison, repeated-measures experimental design Participants Older (55 years or older), spousal caregivers of persons with stroke. Participants must be living with and caring for the stroke survivor, and the stroke must have been a first-ever stroke, occurring 6 to 36 months prior to enrolment Interventions Self-Care TALK is a behavioural intervention involving 6-weekly semi-structured telephone sessions with an advanced practice nurse. Written materials are available for use during the Self-Care TALK sessions. Sessions focus: healthy habits, building self esteem, focusing on the positive, avoiding role overload, communicating, and building meaning Outcomes Primary outcome measures: SF-36v2, PCS (perceived physical health) SF-36v2, MCS (perceived mental health) (time frame: 2 months and 6 months postenrolment) Secondary outcome measures: M-CSI: modified (caregiver strain), SRAHP (self efficacy for health), CED-D (depression) (time frame: 2 and 6 months postenrolment) Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers of stroke survivors (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 46
Teel 2005 (Continued) Starting date July 2005 Contact information Cynthia Teel, PhD RN, University of Kansas School of Nursing, USA Notes mRS: modified Rankin Scale RCT: randomised controlled trial SF-36: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers of stroke survivors (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 47
Page 1 and 2: Non-pharmacological interventions f
Page 3 and 4: [Intervention Review] Non-pharmacol
Page 5 and 6: mental demands, autonomy in decisio
Page 7 and 8: We also checked the reference lists
Page 9 and 10: Figure 1. Flowchart of search resul
Page 11 and 12: Excluded studies For details of exc
Page 13 and 14: Informal caregiver satisfaction One
Page 15 and 16: References to studies included in t
Page 17 and 18: patients. Journal of Evidence-based
Page 19 and 20: 16th AEP Congress - Abstract book.
Page 21 and 22: Radloff 1977 Radloff LS. The CES-D
Page 23 and 24: Draper 2007 (Continued) Bias Author
Page 25 and 26: Grant 2002 (Continued) Blinding (pe
Page 27 and 28: Kalra 2004 Methods Procedures for e
Page 29 and 30: Kalra 2004 (Continued) Judgement: i
Page 31 and 32: Mant 2000 (Continued) Number of str
Page 33 and 34: Pierce 2004 (Continued) Outcomes CE
Page 35 and 36: FIM: Functional Independence Measur
Page 37 and 38: (Continued) McLellan 1995 Stroke su
Page 39 and 40: Ostwald 2007 Methods RCT Participan
Page 41 and 42: Díez 2008 Trial name or title Care
Page 43 and 44: Forster 2007 (Continued) Interventi
Page 45 and 46: Graven 2008 (Continued) Outcomes Pr
Page 47: Hautzinger 2007 (Continued) Notes M
Page 51 and 52: Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Experime
Page 53 and 54: Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Experime
Page 55 and 56: 15. (home-based or community-based)
Page 57 and 58: H I S T O R Y Protocol first publis

Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers ... - Update Software

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?