Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

61996J0085 European Court reports 1998 Page I-02691 12 11992E006 : N 55 56 63 11992E008A : N 59 - 62 11992E048 : N 31 32 34 45 58 11992E051 : N 31 58 CONCERNS Interprets 31968R1612-A07P2 Interprets 31971R1408-A04P1LH SUB Free movement of workers ; Social security for migrant workers AUTLANG German OBSERV Federal Republic of Germany ; Spain ; France ; United Kingdom ; Commission ; Member States ; Institutions NATIONA Federal Republic of Germany NATCOUR *A9* Landessozialgericht Bayern, Vorlagebeschluß vom 02/02/1996 (L 9 Eg 8/94) *P1* Landessozialgericht Bayern, Schreiben vom 11/05/2000 (L 9 Eg 8/94) NOTES Novak, Meinhard: European Law Reporter 1998 p.304-305 Idot, Laurence: Europe 1998 Juillet Comm. no 241 p.14 Van der Steen, I.: Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 1998 p.163-166 Gutmann, Rolf: Informationsbrief Ausländerrecht 1998 p.320-322 Denys, C.: Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 1998 p.210-213 X.L.: Petites affiches. La Loi 1998 no 148 p.14-15 Albors-Llorens, Albertina: The Cambridge Law Journal 1998 p.461-463 X: Il Foro italiano 1998 IV Col.381-382 X: Giurisprudenza italiana 1998 p.1708-1709 Verschueren, Herwig: Tijdschrift voor vreemdelingenrecht 1998 p.19-23 Fries, Sybilla ; Shaw, Jo: European Public Law 1998 p.533-559 Cabral, Pedro: Revue du marché unique européen 1998 no 3 p.254-256 Prévédourou, Evgenia: Epitheorisis Dimosiou Dikaiou kai Dioikitikou Dikaiou 1998 p.975-979 O'Leary, Siofra: European Law Review 1999 p.68-79 Luby, Monique: Journal du droit international 1999 p.557-559 Schrauwen, A.: S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 1999 p.429-430 Whelan, Anthony: Revue des affaires européennes 1999 p.228-238 Whelan, Anthony: The Bar Review 2000 Vol.5 p.179-185 Tomuschat, Christian: Common Market Law Review 2000 p.449-457 PROCEDU Reference for a preliminary ruling ADVGEN La Pergola JUDGRAP Edward DATES of document: 12/05/1998 of application: 20/03/1996 © An extract from a JUSTIS database 170
61996J0369 European Court reports 1999 Page I-08453 1 Judgment of the Court of 23 November 1999 Criminal proceedings against Jean-Claude Arblade and Arblade & Fils SARL (C-369/96) and Bernard Leloup, Serge Leloup and Sofrage SARL (C-376/96). References for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal correctionnel de Huy - Belgium. Freedom to provide services - Temporary deployment of workers for the purposes of performing a contract - Restrictions. Joined cases C-369/96 and C-376/96. 1 Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Whether undertakings in the construction sector supplying a service may be required to pay minimum remuneration fixed by collective agreement applicable in the host Member State - Conditions (EC Treaty, Art. 59 (now, after amendment, Art. 49 EC) and Art. 60 (now Art. 50 EC)) 2 Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Whether undertakings in the construction sector supplying a service may be required to pay employers' contributions at the same time as comparable contributions in the place of establishment - Not permissible (EC Treaty, Art. 59 (now, after amendment, Art. 49 EC) and Art. 60 (now Art. 50 EC)) 3 Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Whether undertakings in the construction sector supplying a service may be required to draw up social or labour documents at the same time as comparable documents held in the place of establishment - Not permissible (EC Treaty, Art. 59 (now, after amendment, Art. 49 EC) and Art. 60 (now Art. 50 EC)) 4 Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Whether undertakings in the construction sector supplying a service may be required to keep social and labour documents available in the territory of the host Member State - Conditions (EC Treaty, Art. 59 (now, after amendment, Art. 49 EC) and Art. 60 (now Art. 50 EC)) 5 Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Whether undertakings in the construction sector supplying a service may be required to retain, after termination of activities in the host Member State, social documents at the address within that Member State of a natural person - Not permissible (EC Treaty, Art. 59 (now, after amendment, Art. 49 EC) and Art. 60 (now Art. 50 EC)) 1 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50 EC) do not preclude a Member State from requiring an undertaking established in another Member State, operating in the construction sector and temporarily carrying out work in the first State, to pay the workers deployed by it the minimum remuneration fixed by the collective labour agreement applicable in the first Member State, provided that the provisions in question are sufficiently precise and accessible, and that they do not render it impossible or excessively difficult in practice for such an employer to determine the obligations with which he is required to comply. 2 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50 EC) preclude a Member State from requiring - even by way of public-order legislation - an undertaking established in another Member State, operating in the construction sector and temporarily carrying out work in the first State, to pay, in respect of each worker deployed, employers' contributions to schemes such as the `timbres-intempéries' and `timbres-fidélité' schemes, and to issue to each of such workers an individual record, where the undertaking in question is already subject, in the Member State in which it is established, to obligations which are essentially comparable, as regards their objective of safeguarding the interests of workers, and which relate to the same workers and the same periods of activity. © An extract from a JUSTIS database 171
Page 1 and 2:
Master’s Program 2004/2005 Techni
Page 3 and 4:
Alberta iela 13 LV-1010 Riga Latvia
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Session no. 18-21 16-21 Monday 19 S
Page 11 and 12:
61984J0178 European Court reports 1
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120: 62000J0389 European Court reports 2
Page 169: 61996J0085 European Court reports 1
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289:
show all

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?