09.01.2013 Views

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

61998J0405 European Court reports 2001 Page I-01795 3<br />

National legislation<br />

3 Lagen 1978:763 med vissa bestämmelser om marknadsföring av alkoholdrycker (Swedish Law 1978:763<br />

laying down provisions on the Marketing of Alcoholic Beverages, as amended, hereinafter the<br />

Alkoholreklamlagen), which entered into force on 1 July 1979, is, according to Article 1, applicable to the<br />

promotion of alcoholic beverages to consumers by manufacturers <strong>and</strong> retailers. Pursuant to the<br />

Alkohollagen 1994:738 (Swedish Law on Alcohol), alcoholic beverages are beverages containing more<br />

than 2.25% of alcohol by volume. Those beverages comprise spirits, wines, strong beer (containing more<br />

than 3.5% of alcohol by volume) <strong>and</strong> beer (containing between 2.25% <strong>and</strong> 3.5% of alcohol by volume).<br />

4 Article 2 of the Alkoholreklamlagen provides:<br />

In view of the health risks involved in alcohol consumption, alcoholic beverages should be marketed with<br />

particular moderation. In particular, advertisements or other marketing measures must not be insistent,<br />

involve unsolicited approaches or encourage alcohol consumption.<br />

Advertising may not be used to market alcoholic beverages on radio or television. The same prohibition<br />

applies to satellite broadcasts subject to Law 1996:844 on Radio <strong>and</strong> Television.<br />

Advertising may not be used to market spirits, wines or strong beers either in periodicals or in other<br />

publications subject to the Regulation on Press Freedom <strong>and</strong> comparable to periodicals by reason of their<br />

publication schedule. That prohibition does not however apply to publications distributed solely at the<br />

point of sale of such beverages. Law 1996:851.<br />

5 It is apparent from the order for reference that, owing to the object of the Alkoholreklamlagen, which is<br />

to restrict the possibilities of marketing alcoholic beverages to consumers, the prohibition on<br />

advertisements in periodicals does not apply to advertisements in the specialist press, meaning the press<br />

aimed essentially at traders, that is to say, in particular, at manufacturers <strong>and</strong> restaurateurs.<br />

6 It is also apparent from the order for reference that advertising on the public highway <strong>and</strong> the direct<br />

mailing of advertising material to individuals, in particular, are regarded as contrary to the obligation to<br />

exercise moderation laid down by the Alkoholreklamlagen.<br />

Main proceedings<br />

7 GIP publishes a magazine entitled Gourmet. Issue No 4 (August-October 1997) of the edition intended<br />

for subscribers contained three pages of advertisements for alcoholic beverages, one for red wine <strong>and</strong> two<br />

for whisky. Those pages did not appear in the edition sold in shops. According to the order for reference,<br />

90% of the magazine's 9 300 subscribers are traders, manufacturers or retailers, <strong>and</strong> 10% are private<br />

individuals.<br />

8 The Consumer Ombudsman applied to the Stockholms Tingsrätt for an injunction, <strong>and</strong> imposition of a<br />

fine in the event of failure to comply therewith, restraining GIP from contributing to the marketing of<br />

alcoholic beverages to consumers by means of such advertisements, which were contrary to Article 2 of<br />

the Alkoholreklamlagen.<br />

9 GIP contended that the application should be dismissed. It argued, in particular, that the proceedings<br />

brought against it were based on legislation that was contrary to Community law.<br />

10 When examining the application, the Tingsrätt was unsure, in particular, whether national rules<br />

imposing an absolute prohibition on certain advertisements might be regarded as having an effect<br />

equivalent to a quantitative restriction within the meaning of Article 30 of the Treaty <strong>and</strong>, if so, whether,<br />

in view of their object, they might be regarded as lawful under Article 36 of the Treaty. It was also<br />

unsure whether such national rules were compatible with the freedom to provide services.<br />

11 The Stockholms Tingsrätt considered that an interpretation of the relevant provisions of the<br />

© An extract from a JUSTIS database<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!