Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
61998J0405 European Court reports 2001 Page I-01795 3<br />
National legislation<br />
3 Lagen 1978:763 med vissa bestämmelser om marknadsföring av alkoholdrycker (Swedish Law 1978:763<br />
laying down provisions on the Marketing of Alcoholic Beverages, as amended, hereinafter the<br />
Alkoholreklamlagen), which entered into force on 1 July 1979, is, according to Article 1, applicable to the<br />
promotion of alcoholic beverages to consumers by manufacturers <strong>and</strong> retailers. Pursuant to the<br />
Alkohollagen 1994:738 (Swedish Law on Alcohol), alcoholic beverages are beverages containing more<br />
than 2.25% of alcohol by volume. Those beverages comprise spirits, wines, strong beer (containing more<br />
than 3.5% of alcohol by volume) <strong>and</strong> beer (containing between 2.25% <strong>and</strong> 3.5% of alcohol by volume).<br />
4 Article 2 of the Alkoholreklamlagen provides:<br />
In view of the health risks involved in alcohol consumption, alcoholic beverages should be marketed with<br />
particular moderation. In particular, advertisements or other marketing measures must not be insistent,<br />
involve unsolicited approaches or encourage alcohol consumption.<br />
Advertising may not be used to market alcoholic beverages on radio or television. The same prohibition<br />
applies to satellite broadcasts subject to Law 1996:844 on Radio <strong>and</strong> Television.<br />
Advertising may not be used to market spirits, wines or strong beers either in periodicals or in other<br />
publications subject to the Regulation on Press Freedom <strong>and</strong> comparable to periodicals by reason of their<br />
publication schedule. That prohibition does not however apply to publications distributed solely at the<br />
point of sale of such beverages. Law 1996:851.<br />
5 It is apparent from the order for reference that, owing to the object of the Alkoholreklamlagen, which is<br />
to restrict the possibilities of marketing alcoholic beverages to consumers, the prohibition on<br />
advertisements in periodicals does not apply to advertisements in the specialist press, meaning the press<br />
aimed essentially at traders, that is to say, in particular, at manufacturers <strong>and</strong> restaurateurs.<br />
6 It is also apparent from the order for reference that advertising on the public highway <strong>and</strong> the direct<br />
mailing of advertising material to individuals, in particular, are regarded as contrary to the obligation to<br />
exercise moderation laid down by the Alkoholreklamlagen.<br />
Main proceedings<br />
7 GIP publishes a magazine entitled Gourmet. Issue No 4 (August-October 1997) of the edition intended<br />
for subscribers contained three pages of advertisements for alcoholic beverages, one for red wine <strong>and</strong> two<br />
for whisky. Those pages did not appear in the edition sold in shops. According to the order for reference,<br />
90% of the magazine's 9 300 subscribers are traders, manufacturers or retailers, <strong>and</strong> 10% are private<br />
individuals.<br />
8 The Consumer Ombudsman applied to the Stockholms Tingsrätt for an injunction, <strong>and</strong> imposition of a<br />
fine in the event of failure to comply therewith, restraining GIP from contributing to the marketing of<br />
alcoholic beverages to consumers by means of such advertisements, which were contrary to Article 2 of<br />
the Alkoholreklamlagen.<br />
9 GIP contended that the application should be dismissed. It argued, in particular, that the proceedings<br />
brought against it were based on legislation that was contrary to Community law.<br />
10 When examining the application, the Tingsrätt was unsure, in particular, whether national rules<br />
imposing an absolute prohibition on certain advertisements might be regarded as having an effect<br />
equivalent to a quantitative restriction within the meaning of Article 30 of the Treaty <strong>and</strong>, if so, whether,<br />
in view of their object, they might be regarded as lawful under Article 36 of the Treaty. It was also<br />
unsure whether such national rules were compatible with the freedom to provide services.<br />
11 The Stockholms Tingsrätt considered that an interpretation of the relevant provisions of the<br />
© An extract from a JUSTIS database<br />
97