Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
61996J0369 European Court reports 1999 Page I-08453 2<br />
3 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50<br />
EC) preclude a Member State from requiring - even by way of public-order legislation - an undertaking<br />
established in another Member State, operating in the construction sector <strong>and</strong> temporarily carrying out<br />
work in the first State, to draw up social or labour documents such as labour rules, a special staff register<br />
<strong>and</strong> an individual account for each worker in the form prescribed by the rules of the first State, where the<br />
social protection of workers which may justify those requirements is already safeguarded by the production<br />
of social <strong>and</strong> labour documents kept by the undertaking in question in accordance with the rules applying<br />
in the Member State in which it is established.<br />
That is the position where, as regards the keeping of social <strong>and</strong> labour documents, the undertaking is<br />
already subject, in the Member State in which it is established, to obligations which are comparable, as<br />
regards their objective of safeguarding the interests of workers, to those imposed by the legislation of the<br />
host Member State, <strong>and</strong> which relate to the same workers <strong>and</strong> the same periods of activity.<br />
4 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50<br />
EC) do not preclude a Member State from requiring an undertaking established in another Member State,<br />
operating in the construction sector <strong>and</strong> temporarily carrying out work in the first State, to keep social <strong>and</strong><br />
labour documents available, throughout the period of activity within the territory of the first Member State,<br />
on site or in an accessible <strong>and</strong> clearly identified place within the territory of that State, where such a<br />
measure is necessary in order to enable it effectively to monitor compliance with legislation of that State<br />
which is justified by the need to safeguard the social protection of workers.<br />
5 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50<br />
EC) preclude a Member State from requiring - even by way of public-order legislation - an undertaking<br />
established in another Member State, operating in the construction sector <strong>and</strong> temporarily carrying out<br />
work in the first State, to retain, for a period of five years after the undertaking in question has ceased to<br />
employ workers in the first Member State, social documents such as a staff register <strong>and</strong> individual<br />
accounts, at the address within that Member State of a natural person who holds those documents as an<br />
agent or servant. Such requirements cannot be justified, since the monitoring of compliance with rules<br />
concerning the social protection of workers in the construction industry can be achieved by less restrictive<br />
measures.<br />
In Joined Cases C-369/96 <strong>and</strong> C-376/96,<br />
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Tribunal<br />
Correctionnel de Huy (Belgium) for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings pending before that<br />
court against<br />
Jean-Claude Arblade,<br />
Arblade & Fils SARL, as the party civilly liable (C-369/96),<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
Bernard Leloup,<br />
Serge Leloup,<br />
Sofrage SARL, as the party civilly liable (C-376/96),<br />
on the interpretation of Articles 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the<br />
EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC),<br />
THE COURT,<br />
composed of: G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias, President, J.C. Moitinho de Almeida, D.A.O. Edward (Rapporteur),<br />
© An extract from a JUSTIS database<br />
172