09.01.2013 Views

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

61996J0369 European Court reports 1999 Page I-08453 2<br />

3 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50<br />

EC) preclude a Member State from requiring - even by way of public-order legislation - an undertaking<br />

established in another Member State, operating in the construction sector <strong>and</strong> temporarily carrying out<br />

work in the first State, to draw up social or labour documents such as labour rules, a special staff register<br />

<strong>and</strong> an individual account for each worker in the form prescribed by the rules of the first State, where the<br />

social protection of workers which may justify those requirements is already safeguarded by the production<br />

of social <strong>and</strong> labour documents kept by the undertaking in question in accordance with the rules applying<br />

in the Member State in which it is established.<br />

That is the position where, as regards the keeping of social <strong>and</strong> labour documents, the undertaking is<br />

already subject, in the Member State in which it is established, to obligations which are comparable, as<br />

regards their objective of safeguarding the interests of workers, to those imposed by the legislation of the<br />

host Member State, <strong>and</strong> which relate to the same workers <strong>and</strong> the same periods of activity.<br />

4 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50<br />

EC) do not preclude a Member State from requiring an undertaking established in another Member State,<br />

operating in the construction sector <strong>and</strong> temporarily carrying out work in the first State, to keep social <strong>and</strong><br />

labour documents available, throughout the period of activity within the territory of the first Member State,<br />

on site or in an accessible <strong>and</strong> clearly identified place within the territory of that State, where such a<br />

measure is necessary in order to enable it effectively to monitor compliance with legislation of that State<br />

which is justified by the need to safeguard the social protection of workers.<br />

5 Articles 59 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the Treaty (now Article 50<br />

EC) preclude a Member State from requiring - even by way of public-order legislation - an undertaking<br />

established in another Member State, operating in the construction sector <strong>and</strong> temporarily carrying out<br />

work in the first State, to retain, for a period of five years after the undertaking in question has ceased to<br />

employ workers in the first Member State, social documents such as a staff register <strong>and</strong> individual<br />

accounts, at the address within that Member State of a natural person who holds those documents as an<br />

agent or servant. Such requirements cannot be justified, since the monitoring of compliance with rules<br />

concerning the social protection of workers in the construction industry can be achieved by less restrictive<br />

measures.<br />

In Joined Cases C-369/96 <strong>and</strong> C-376/96,<br />

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Tribunal<br />

Correctionnel de Huy (Belgium) for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings pending before that<br />

court against<br />

Jean-Claude Arblade,<br />

Arblade & Fils SARL, as the party civilly liable (C-369/96),<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Bernard Leloup,<br />

Serge Leloup,<br />

Sofrage SARL, as the party civilly liable (C-376/96),<br />

on the interpretation of Articles 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) <strong>and</strong> 60 of the<br />

EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC),<br />

THE COURT,<br />

composed of: G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias, President, J.C. Moitinho de Almeida, D.A.O. Edward (Rapporteur),<br />

© An extract from a JUSTIS database<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!