Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
61996J0056 European Court reports 1997 Page I-03143 1<br />
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber)<br />
of 5 June 1997<br />
VT4 Ltd v Vlaamse Gemeenschap.<br />
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Raad van State - Belgium.<br />
Free movement of services - Television broadcasting - Establishment - Evasion of domestic<br />
legislation.<br />
Case C-56/96.<br />
Freedom to provide services - Television broadcasting - Directive 89/552 - Television broadcaster under<br />
the jurisdiction of a Member State - Determining criterion - Establishment - Broadcaster established in<br />
more than one Member State<br />
(Council Directive 89/552, Art. 2(1))<br />
Article 2(1) of Directive 89/552 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or<br />
administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities is to be<br />
interpreted as meaning that a television broadcaster comes under the jurisdiction of the Member State in<br />
which it is established.<br />
Although the directive contains no express definition of the phrase `broadcasters under [the] jurisdiction [of<br />
a Member State]', it follows from the wording of Article 2(1) that the concept of jurisdiction of a Member<br />
State has to be understood as necessarily covering jurisdiction ratione personae over television<br />
broadcasters, which can be based only on their connection to that State's legal system, which in substance<br />
overlaps with the concept of establishment as used in the first paragraph of Article 59 of the Treaty, the<br />
wording of which presupposes that the supplier <strong>and</strong> the recipient of a service are `established' in two<br />
different Member States.<br />
Where a television broadcaster is established in more than one Member State, the Member State having<br />
jurisdiction over it is the Member State in which the broadcaster has the centre of its activities, in<br />
particular the place where decisions concerning programme policy are taken <strong>and</strong> where the programmes to<br />
be broadcast are finally put together.<br />
In Case C-56/96,<br />
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Raad van State, Belgium, for a<br />
preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between<br />
VT4 Ltd<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
Vlaamse Gemeenschap,<br />
Third parties:<br />
Intercommunale Maatschappij voor Gas en Elektriciteit van het Westen (Gaselwest) <strong>and</strong> Others,<br />
Vlaamse Uitgeversmaatschappij NV (VUM) Integan Intercommunale CV <strong>and</strong> Others,<br />
Vlaamse Televisie Maatschappij NV (VTM),<br />
on the interpretation of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain<br />
provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit<br />
of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23),<br />
THE COURT<br />
(Sixth Chamber),<br />
composed of: G.F. Mancini, President of the Chamber, J.L. Murray, C.N. Kakouris, P.J.G. Kapteyn<br />
(Rapporteur) <strong>and</strong> H. Ragnemalm, Judges,<br />
© An extract from a JUSTIS database<br />
240