09.01.2013 Views

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

61996J0056 European Court reports 1997 Page I-03143 1<br />

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber)<br />

of 5 June 1997<br />

VT4 Ltd v Vlaamse Gemeenschap.<br />

Reference for a preliminary ruling: Raad van State - Belgium.<br />

Free movement of services - Television broadcasting - Establishment - Evasion of domestic<br />

legislation.<br />

Case C-56/96.<br />

Freedom to provide services - Television broadcasting - Directive 89/552 - Television broadcaster under<br />

the jurisdiction of a Member State - Determining criterion - Establishment - Broadcaster established in<br />

more than one Member State<br />

(Council Directive 89/552, Art. 2(1))<br />

Article 2(1) of Directive 89/552 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or<br />

administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities is to be<br />

interpreted as meaning that a television broadcaster comes under the jurisdiction of the Member State in<br />

which it is established.<br />

Although the directive contains no express definition of the phrase `broadcasters under [the] jurisdiction [of<br />

a Member State]', it follows from the wording of Article 2(1) that the concept of jurisdiction of a Member<br />

State has to be understood as necessarily covering jurisdiction ratione personae over television<br />

broadcasters, which can be based only on their connection to that State's legal system, which in substance<br />

overlaps with the concept of establishment as used in the first paragraph of Article 59 of the Treaty, the<br />

wording of which presupposes that the supplier <strong>and</strong> the recipient of a service are `established' in two<br />

different Member States.<br />

Where a television broadcaster is established in more than one Member State, the Member State having<br />

jurisdiction over it is the Member State in which the broadcaster has the centre of its activities, in<br />

particular the place where decisions concerning programme policy are taken <strong>and</strong> where the programmes to<br />

be broadcast are finally put together.<br />

In Case C-56/96,<br />

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Raad van State, Belgium, for a<br />

preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between<br />

VT4 Ltd<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Vlaamse Gemeenschap,<br />

Third parties:<br />

Intercommunale Maatschappij voor Gas en Elektriciteit van het Westen (Gaselwest) <strong>and</strong> Others,<br />

Vlaamse Uitgeversmaatschappij NV (VUM) Integan Intercommunale CV <strong>and</strong> Others,<br />

Vlaamse Televisie Maatschappij NV (VTM),<br />

on the interpretation of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain<br />

provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit<br />

of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23),<br />

THE COURT<br />

(Sixth Chamber),<br />

composed of: G.F. Mancini, President of the Chamber, J.L. Murray, C.N. Kakouris, P.J.G. Kapteyn<br />

(Rapporteur) <strong>and</strong> H. Ragnemalm, Judges,<br />

© An extract from a JUSTIS database<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!