Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

61999J0513 European Court reports 2002 Page I-07213 16 NATIONA Finland NATCOUR *A9* Korkein hallinto-oikeus, välipäätös 17/12/1999 (4150 ; 1896/1/98) NOTES Krohn, Wolfram: European Law Reporter 2002 p.312-314 Steinberg, Philipp: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2002 p.634-635 Ménéménis, Alain: Droit administratif 2002 no 174 Pachner, Franz: Zeitschrift für Vergaberecht und Beschaffungspraxis 2002 p.292-294 Schima, Bernhard: Zeitschrift für Vergaberecht und Beschaffungspraxis 2002 p.315-317 Noel, Guillaume: La Semaine juridique - édition générale 2002 II 10 003 Hoffer, Raoul ; Epler, Alice: Ecolex 2002 p.937-940 Lottini, Michela: Il Foro amministrativo 2002 p.1950-1957 Falk, Jan-Erik: Europarättslig tidskrift 2003 p.149-154 PROCEDU Reference for a preliminary ruling ADVGEN Mischo JUDGRAP Skouris DATES of document: 17/09/2002 of application: 28/12/1999 © An extract from a JUSTIS database 78
61988J0362 European Court reports 1990 Page I-00667 1 Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 1990 GB-INNO-BM v Confédération du commerce luxembourgeois. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour de cassation - Grand-Duchy de Luxembourg. Free movement of goods - National prohibition on publication of the duration of a special offer or the price previously charged. Case C-362/88. ++++ 1 . Free movement of goods - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Concept - Restrictions on cross-frontier advertising (EEC Treaty, Arts 30, 31 and 36 ) 2 . Free movement of goods - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Prohibition against referring, in advertisements for a special purchase offer, to the duration of the offer or the price previously charged - Application to advertising lawfully distributed in another Member State - Not permissible - Justification - Consumer protection - Not justifiable (EEC Treaty, Arts 30 and 36 ) 1 . Legislation which restricts or prohibits certain forms of advertising and certain means of sales promotion may, although it does not directly affect trade, be such as to restrict the volume of trade because it affects marketing opportunities. Free movement of goods concerns not only traders but also individuals . it requires, particularly in frontier areas, that consumers resident in one Member State may travel freely to the territory of another Member State to shop under the same conditions as the local population. That freedom for consumers is compromised if they are deprived of access to advertising available in the country where purchases are made. Consequently a prohibition against distributing such advertising must be examined in the light of Articles 30, 31 and 36 of the EEC Treaty. 2 . Under Articles 30 and 36 of the Treaty, advertising lawfully distributed in another Member State cannot be made subject to national legislation prohibiting the inclusion, in advertisements relating to a special purchase offer, of a statement showing the duration of the offer or the previous price. Since Community law regards the provision of information to the consumer as one of the principal requirements with regard to consumer protection, Article 30 of the Treaty cannot be interpreted as meaning that national legislation which denies the consumer access to certain kinds of information may be justified by mandatory requirements concerning consumer protection. In Case C-362/88 REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Cour de cassation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between GB-INNO-BM, a company incorporated under Belgian law, Brussels, and Confédération du commerce luxembourgeois, a non-profit-making association established in Luxembourg, on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber ) © An extract from a JUSTIS database 79
Page 1 and 2:
Master’s Program 2004/2005 Techni
Page 3 and 4:
Alberta iela 13 LV-1010 Riga Latvia
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Session no. 18-21 16-21 Monday 19 S
Page 11 and 12:
61984J0178 European Court reports 1
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28: 61995J0189 European Court reports 1
Page 77: 61999J0513 European Court reports 2
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289:
show all

Master's Program 2004/2005 Technical and Fiscal Barriers ... - Lexnet

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?