11.01.2013 Views

Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds

Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds

Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 S. Campagna et al.<br />

ground state, before excitation <strong>and</strong> any electron transfer process. The triad<br />

would then be better defined as a D/P–A system, <strong>and</strong> electron transfer between<br />

D <strong>and</strong> P + subunits in the intermediate state D/P + –A – can be largely<br />

faster than that reported for the D–P ∗ dyad, <strong>and</strong> even faster than charge<br />

recombination between C + <strong>and</strong> A – in the assembly, justifying the high efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> the fully developed charge separation. Ground-state<br />

association <strong>of</strong> tethered aromatic lig<strong>and</strong>s (with flexible linkages) with Ru(II)<br />

chromophores was also known in a tetranuclear dendrimer [272, 273], further<br />

supporting these conclusions.<br />

The triad 43 involves components similar to those used in the former<br />

discussed systems, but the connecting scheme is different [294]. Here, the<br />

chromophore <strong>and</strong> the electron donor <strong>and</strong> acceptor subunits are all linked to<br />

a lysine moiety. The charge-separated state <strong>of</strong> this triad stores 1.17 eV <strong>and</strong><br />

lives for 108 ns (rate constant <strong>of</strong> charge recombination kCR = 9.26 × 10 6 s –1 )<br />

in acetonitrile, as observed by transient spectroscopy. The efficiency <strong>of</strong> formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the charge-separated state is about 34%. On the basis <strong>of</strong> detailed<br />

photophysical studies <strong>of</strong> isolated dyads [294], the authors believe that the only<br />

route leading to fully developed charge separation is reductive quenching <strong>of</strong><br />

D–P ∗ –A leading to D + –P – –A, followed by a second electron transfer leading<br />

to D + –P–A – , whereas the route passing through the population <strong>of</strong> the D–P + –<br />

A – intermediate does not lead to the full charge-separated species, but leads<br />

directly to the ground state. Therefore, the occurrence <strong>of</strong> oxidative electron<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> P* would be the main reason for the efficiency loss in the whole<br />

process. Better results were obtained by modifying the acceptor site <strong>of</strong> the<br />

triad, as shown in 44 [295]. In this species, the energy stored by the chargeseparated<br />

species is higher (1.54 eV), since the anthraquinone has a less negative<br />

reduction potential than the methyl viologen subunit, <strong>and</strong> the lifetime<br />

<strong>of</strong> the charge-separated state is longer (174 ns, kCR = 5.7 × 10 6 s –1 ), but the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!