11.01.2013 Views

Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds

Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds

Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Photochemistry</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Photophysics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Coordination</strong> <strong>Compounds</strong>: Ruthenium 171<br />

nated by reductive electron transfer involving the PTZ electron donor, in<br />

a process which is largely solvent dependent, as is the driving force <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process. Then, there is a fast electron transfer from the reduced metal chromophore<br />

to the Anq subunit, which yields the charge-separated state. There<br />

is a strong solvent-dependent competition between such a second electron<br />

transfer, which allows for fully developed charge separation <strong>and</strong> back electron<br />

transfer in the D + –P – –A intermediate. The consequence <strong>of</strong> this solvent<br />

dependence is that going from 1,2-dichloroethane to dimethylacetamide, the<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> charge separation changes from 33 to 96%. Also, the charge recombination<br />

is solvent dependent, <strong>and</strong> the electronic coupling between PTZ +<br />

<strong>and</strong> Anq – was calulated to be about 0.13 cm –1 [300].<br />

A more elaborated polyad based on the formerly described systems is<br />

the D–P–P–A tetrad 47 [301]. This is the evolution <strong>of</strong> a system quite related<br />

to 46, where substituents on the terminal bpy lig<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the metal<br />

chromophore are used to favor the thermodynamics <strong>of</strong> the (reductive) first<br />

electron transfer step. This modification led to an efficiency <strong>of</strong> charge separation<br />

<strong>of</strong> 90% in acetonitrile for the corresponding triad. In the tetrad, 13<br />

proline spacers are present between PTZ <strong>and</strong> Anq. The efficiency <strong>of</strong> formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the charge-separated state in the tetrad is 60% <strong>and</strong> its lifetime is 2 µs<br />

(kCR = 5.0 × 10 5 s –1 ). Excitation can occur in both the Ru chromophores, but<br />

apparently the result is not identical. Excitation <strong>of</strong> the Ru(II) complex adjacent<br />

to the PTZ electron donor gives the D + –P – –P–A system. To produce the<br />

fully developed D + –P–P–A + species, it is proposed that a stepwise mechanism<br />

occurs, with the species D + –P–P – –A as an intermediate. Efficient, isoergonic<br />

electron transfer between the two chromophores is therefore foreseen. Excitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Ru(II) complex adjacent to the electron acceptor Anq subunit<br />

would be unproductive in a direct sense, since oxidative electron transfer by<br />

Anq is unfavorable thermodynamically <strong>and</strong> direct quenching from the PTZ<br />

unit is unlikely because <strong>of</strong> the large distance. However, even excitation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Ru(II) chromophore can become productive, provided that isoergonic energy<br />

transfer to the Ru(II) chromophore adjacent to the PTZ unit takes place. Since<br />

the quantum efficiency <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> the charge-separated state is 60%,<br />

<strong>and</strong> considering that excitation <strong>of</strong> the two identical Ru(II) chromophores

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!