Activation of new aaa units - Air Defense Artillery
Activation of new aaa units - Air Defense Artillery
Activation of new aaa units - Air Defense Artillery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Antiaircraft Guided Missile<br />
By Lieutenant Colonel William L. Clay, Ord.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
During the last year, the attention <strong>of</strong> the reader <strong>of</strong> articles<br />
on guided missiles has been focused on the German V-I<br />
and \'-2 rockets which were conceived and employed <strong>of</strong>fensively<br />
during \Vorld War 11. Although these rocketpropelled<br />
devices, strictly speaking, were not guided missiles<br />
in the true sense <strong>of</strong> the word since no control was<br />
exercised after launching, they did represent the first step<br />
in this direction and were intended ultimately to be completely<br />
automatic in control. Particularly, in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />
V-2, these articles have illustrated the complexity <strong>of</strong> engineering<br />
problems which are encountered in the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> weapons <strong>of</strong> this type. This complexity is also<br />
apparent from the fact that approximately ten years <strong>of</strong> German<br />
research and development work in the fields <strong>of</strong> propulsion,<br />
control, and aerodynamics were required before successful<br />
results were obtained. However, despite the great<br />
technical achievements that were attained, the resultant<br />
product was expensive in man-hours, inefficient in payload,<br />
and inaccurate in range.<br />
Previous articles in the JOURNAL have empasized the<br />
complex nature <strong>of</strong> the research program in the guided<br />
missile field, particularly with reference to the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> an antiaircraft guided missile which requires, for successful<br />
application, a completely automatic guidance system<br />
and extreme accuracy at relatively long range. Since this<br />
Figure I-Booster, Missile and Launcher.<br />
weapon has been little publicized as yet because <strong>of</strong> security<br />
restrictions and since it is vitally important for defensive<br />
purposes, it is believed that a general description <strong>of</strong> such<br />
a system as presently visualized will better acquaint the<br />
layman with the various types <strong>of</strong> complicated engineering<br />
problems to be encountered in the research and development<br />
program.<br />
But before discussing the components <strong>of</strong> this system, perhaps<br />
it would be <strong>of</strong> interest to comment brieRy on the reasons<br />
that motivated German and American development in<br />
the missile field.<br />
THEND IN DEVELOPMENT<br />
In the German program, emphasis on the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> specific types <strong>of</strong> missiles was influenced primarily by the<br />
progress <strong>of</strong> the war. Although fundamental research was<br />
initiated in the early 1930's, rocket-propelled missiles did<br />
not make their appearance until the middle <strong>of</strong> 1943. At that<br />
time, the Germans began employing radia-controlled bombs<br />
which were guided remotely by visual observation. These<br />
missiles were used <strong>of</strong>fensively against Allied shipping since<br />
the control aircraft could remain out <strong>of</strong> range <strong>of</strong> antiaircraft<br />
fire from the ships. In this phase, the Germans definitely<br />
had the initiative and therefore development was concentrated<br />
on air-ta-surface weapons.<br />
As the war progressed, German air superiority decreased<br />
and finally they were unable to utilize their guided bombs<br />
effectively. In addition, the attempt to bomb England into<br />
submission also failed because <strong>of</strong> effective British air and<br />
ground defenses. As a result, German effort was directed<br />
toward the development <strong>of</strong> surface-to-surface weapons<br />
which would enable them to carry out long-range strategic<br />
bombing. This program resulted in the development <strong>of</strong><br />
the V-I and V-2 missiles which were employed tactically in<br />
the middle <strong>of</strong> 1944.<br />
As the Allied bombing attacks continued to increase in<br />
frequency and effectiveness, the development <strong>of</strong> guided<br />
missiles for defense against bombers was finally given first<br />
priority. Although several <strong>of</strong> these missiles had reached<br />
their final tests and were in limited production, none were<br />
employed tactically. However, their immediate effectiveness<br />
probably would have been limited, since they were<br />
guided visually by remote radio control. The development<br />
<strong>of</strong> completely automatic control systems was suspended in<br />
1945 because <strong>of</strong> the critical manpower shortage and scarcity<br />
<strong>of</strong> materials, Thus, it can be seen that the fortunes <strong>of</strong> war<br />
had a pronounced effect on the trend <strong>of</strong> German de\'elopment.<br />
Guided missile development in the United States during<br />
the war was undertaken bv civilian universities, research<br />
laboratories and industrial ~oncerns in addition to that work<br />
,