14.01.2013 Views

eSafety Compendium Addendum 1 - iCar Support

eSafety Compendium Addendum 1 - iCar Support

eSafety Compendium Addendum 1 - iCar Support

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

National activities:<br />

The Implementation Road Maps Working Group has started a survey concerning the<br />

deployment of the road maps in Europe on the national level. The results are expected in<br />

2007.<br />

<strong>eSafety</strong> Working Groups:<br />

The Implementation Road Maps Working Group of the <strong>eSafety</strong> Forum commenced its<br />

activities in July 2003.The objectives of the Implementation Road Maps Working Group<br />

were:<br />

◊ To identify the technical and economical potentials of the industry as well as the<br />

topics and time table for infrastructure improvements by the public sector with<br />

regard to <strong>eSafety</strong> systems capable of affecting road fatalities in Europe by 2010;<br />

◊ To develop regularly reviewed road map, which focuses technological steps and<br />

economic implication models for introduction of intelligent integrated road safety<br />

systems as well as the required improvements in road and information<br />

infrastructure<br />

After a collection period for all available information and sources concerning <strong>eSafety</strong><br />

relevant systems, a suitable structure was found in defining vehicle based systems as well<br />

as infrastructure based systems and combined solutions like eCall. The evaluation of<br />

these different systems has reflected the following aspects:<br />

◊ Accidents/fatalities to be affected<br />

◊ % change in accidents expected<br />

◊ other side effects/comfort functions<br />

◊ cost of in–vehicle systems<br />

◊ cost for infrastructure systems (investment/maintenance)<br />

◊ cost for information infrastructure (investment/maintenance)<br />

◊ year of technical readiness<br />

◊ year of implementation readiness<br />

◊ user acceptance and willingness to pay<br />

◊ year of implementation by regulation<br />

◊ specific implementation issues<br />

◊ estimation of cars equipped with at 2010 / 2020<br />

◊ other actors involved for implementation<br />

Not all questions could be appropriately answered but it was possible to create a table of<br />

generally prioritized systems, which will have a reasonable impact of the number of<br />

fatalities and with a reasonable deployment for the timeframe, which is on focus.<br />

The priority vehicle based systems are:<br />

◊ ESP (Electronic Stability Program)<br />

◊ Blind spot monitoring<br />

◊ Adaptive head lights<br />

◊ Obstacle & collision warning<br />

◊ Lane departure warning<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!