14.01.2013 Views

eSafety Compendium Addendum 1 - iCar Support

eSafety Compendium Addendum 1 - iCar Support

eSafety Compendium Addendum 1 - iCar Support

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regarding eCall and RTTI, the stakeholders should follow the recommendations of the<br />

eCall Driving Group and the RTTI Working Group.<br />

Concerning dynamic traffic management and local danger warnings, the Implementation<br />

Road Map WG recommends that the road authorities and operators develop together a<br />

European vision and strategy for the deployment and operation of dynamic traffic<br />

management and local danger warning systems in co-operation with vehicle and<br />

telecommunications industry.<br />

Concerning speed alert, the European Commission and the other stakeholders should<br />

solve the currently open issues and utilise the implementation roadmap produced by the<br />

SpeedAlert project.<br />

Prof. Kulmala informed that a renewed Working Group with active membership would<br />

continuously update the 2005 Final Report. In order to do so, the members will add<br />

security as an additional implementation issue to road maps, monitor priority system<br />

deployment in the 25 Member States and create illustrative road maps for decision<br />

makers.<br />

Prof. Kulmala concluded by presenting a proposal of a simplified Road Map.<br />

Heavy-Duty Vehicles Working Group Recommendations<br />

Mr. Francisco Ferreira (EC, DG INFSO), presented the objectives, approach, work<br />

and results attained of the Heavy-Duty Vehicles Working Group.<br />

According to him, the general objective of the Working Group was to investigate how<br />

road safety could be improved in the specific context of heavy-duty vehicles. Its main<br />

tasks had consisted in:<br />

- developing a comprehensive view of road safety of heavy-duty vehicles,<br />

- producing a summary of significant accident types,<br />

- evaluating around fifty safety measures,<br />

- analysing the introduction obstacles such as cost, regulations, …etc and<br />

- defining recommendations.<br />

Mr. Ferreira outlined the main recommendations of the Working Group. According to<br />

him, the differences between passenger cars, vans and heavy-duty vehicles give need for<br />

special treatment to ensure further increase of vehicle safety of heavy-duty vehicles. He<br />

added that due to the high mass of heavy-duty vehicles, the avoidance of accidents<br />

(primary safety, active safety) should have a higher priority than the reduction of accident<br />

consequences (secondary safety, passive safety). The combination of both measures<br />

would have the highest impact in reducing fatalities.<br />

Mr. Ferreira indicated that the broad market penetration of available or ready to market<br />

vehicle safety systems was hindered by a missing business case. The Working Group<br />

underlined that the current regulations for masses and dimensions also hindered, if the<br />

load length should be kept, the introduction of an advanced passive safety system.<br />

The Member States should therefore:<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!