Birds in the European Union - BirdLife International
Birds in the European Union - BirdLife International
Birds in the European Union - BirdLife International
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8<br />
■ RESULTS: BIRDS IN THE EU AND THE<br />
IMPACT OF THE BIRDS DIRECTIVE<br />
This section presents <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>BirdLife</strong> <strong>International</strong>’s<br />
analyses <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> obligations aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> different<br />
articles of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Birds</strong> Directive. The basis for all analyses and<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretation presented <strong>in</strong> this chapter is Table 1 of <strong>the</strong> chapter<br />
Species Tables, which shows analytically <strong>the</strong> results for each<br />
species.<br />
POPULATIONS OF ALL BIRDS: ARTICLES 2<br />
AND 3 OF THE BIRDS DIRECTIVE<br />
Articles 2 and 3 of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Birds</strong> Directive make reference to all<br />
naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g wild birds <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory where this<br />
Directive applies. The Member States have obligations to<br />
protect, conserve and prevent decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> populations of all<br />
those species. This section reports what <strong>the</strong> analyses tell about:<br />
The status of all birds at <strong>the</strong> Pan-<strong>European</strong> level.<br />
The status of all birds at <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> level and<br />
differences between Pan-<strong>European</strong> and EU level.<br />
The population trends of bird species associated with specific<br />
habitat types.<br />
■ The status of all birds at <strong>the</strong> Pan-<strong>European</strong> level<br />
The publication <strong>Birds</strong> <strong>in</strong> Europe (<strong>BirdLife</strong> <strong>International</strong> 2004a),<br />
hereafter BiE2, presents <strong>the</strong> status and trend data for all 524<br />
species occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Europe and identifies those that are Species<br />
of <strong>European</strong> Conservation Concern (SPEC). The publication<br />
considers <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> trends s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994, when <strong>the</strong> last<br />
<strong>BirdLife</strong> <strong>International</strong> publication on <strong>the</strong> status of birds <strong>in</strong><br />
Europe was published (Tucker and Heath 1994).<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to BiE2, 226 species out of 524 (or 43% of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>European</strong> avifauna) have Unfavourable Conservation<br />
sStatus <strong>in</strong> Europe. Ten years ago, at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> first <strong>Birds</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> Europe assessment, this figure was 195 species out of 511<br />
assessed (i.e. 38%) (Tucker and Heath 1994). Overall this means<br />
that 31 more species are <strong>in</strong> trouble now than ten years ago (an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease of 5%).<br />
The species identified as be<strong>in</strong>g Species of <strong>European</strong><br />
Conservation Concern are listed <strong>in</strong> three SPEC categories (see<br />
chapter Methodology). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to BiE2 <strong>the</strong>re are 40 (8%)<br />
species <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SPEC 1 category of globally threatened species,<br />
Figure 1. Absolute numbers and percentage of <strong>European</strong><br />
bird species <strong>in</strong> each category <strong>in</strong> BiE1 and BiE2; Non-SPEC E<br />
corresponds to <strong>the</strong> SPEC 4 category of <strong>Birds</strong> <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />
(Tucker and Heath 1994).<br />
2004 (BiE2)<br />
1994 (BiE1)<br />
40<br />
24<br />
41<br />
45<br />
130<br />
141<br />
SPEC 1<br />
SPEC 2<br />
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%<br />
83<br />
SPEC 3<br />
Non-SPEC E<br />
94<br />
233<br />
Non-SPEC<br />
204<br />
100%<br />
45 (9%) species <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SPEC 2 category, which is <strong>the</strong> category<br />
that <strong>in</strong>cludes species with Unfavourable Conservation Status<br />
<strong>in</strong> Europe and <strong>the</strong>ir global population concentrated <strong>in</strong> Europe,<br />
and 141 (27%) species <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SPEC 3 category, <strong>the</strong> species group<br />
with Unfavourable Conservation Status <strong>in</strong> Europe but whose<br />
global population is not concentrated <strong>in</strong> Europe (see Figure 1).<br />
In most cases, population decl<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> reason for a<br />
species qualify<strong>in</strong>g as a SPEC. Of <strong>the</strong> 129 SPECs listed <strong>in</strong> BiE1<br />
on <strong>the</strong> grounds of decreas<strong>in</strong>g populations between 1970 and<br />
1990, 79 species (61%) cont<strong>in</strong>ued to decl<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s.<br />
They have now been jo<strong>in</strong>ed by 35 species formerly considered<br />
to have a Favourable Conservation Status <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />
Regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period 1990–2000, only 72 species have <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
but 144 species had decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g populations.<br />
In total, <strong>the</strong>re are 45 species, which <strong>in</strong> BiE1 still had<br />
Favourable Conservation Status but deteriorated to<br />
Unfavourable by 2004, while <strong>the</strong>re are 14, which improved from<br />
Unfavourable to Favourable (Tucker and Heath 1994, <strong>BirdLife</strong><br />
<strong>International</strong> 2004a).<br />
Among <strong>the</strong> species slipp<strong>in</strong>g to Unfavourable Conservation<br />
Status <strong>in</strong> 2004 are many migrant waders and passer<strong>in</strong>es, several<br />
waterbirds, and some of Europe’s most familiar species, such<br />
as House Sparrow Passer domesticus and Common Starl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sturnus vulgaris. A group particularly affected is farmland<br />
birds. Among <strong>the</strong> ones that have recovered by 2004 to a<br />
Favourable Status are species such as <strong>the</strong> Peregr<strong>in</strong>e Falcon<br />
Falco peregr<strong>in</strong>us and Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Gannet Morus bassanus. The<br />
full list of species chang<strong>in</strong>g status is given <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
In 2000 <strong>the</strong>re were 226 (43%) species out of 524,<br />
which have Unfavourable Conservation Status at<br />
Pan-<strong>European</strong> level, while <strong>in</strong> 1990 <strong>the</strong>re were 195<br />
out of 511 (38%) bird species which had<br />
Unfavourable Conservation Status across Europe.<br />
This represents an overall <strong>in</strong>crease of 5% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
number of species that are <strong>in</strong> trouble <strong>in</strong> Europe <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> last 10 years.<br />
There are 40 (8%) SPEC 1, 45 (9%) SPEC 2, and<br />
141 (27%) classified SPEC 3 at Pan-<strong>European</strong> level.<br />
■ The status of all birds at <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong><br />
level and differences between Pan-<strong>European</strong> and<br />
EU level<br />
On 1 May 2004, ten countries became new members of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>, which made <strong>the</strong> bloc grow to 25 Member<br />
States (EU25). This was <strong>the</strong> biggest s<strong>in</strong>gle enlargement of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Union</strong> to date, and brought about a considerable enrichment<br />
of <strong>the</strong> EU’s avifauna. Through <strong>the</strong> enlargement process a few<br />
more species were added to <strong>the</strong> EU list, and more importantly,<br />
many species “ga<strong>in</strong>ed” enormously <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir EU population, e.g.<br />
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespert<strong>in</strong>us and Steller’s Eider<br />
Polysticta stelleri. This ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> biodiversity and unique natural<br />
habitats br<strong>in</strong>gs along an <strong>in</strong>creased responsibility of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> for its natural heritage, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g wild birds.<br />
In this review <strong>BirdLife</strong> <strong>International</strong> for <strong>the</strong> first time<br />
assesses <strong>the</strong> Conservation Status of birds at <strong>the</strong> EU25 level, i.e.<br />
tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account only <strong>the</strong> populations occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 25<br />
Member States (EU25). <strong>BirdLife</strong> through this analysis found<br />
that, 216 (48%) species out of 448 species have Unfavourable<br />
Conservation Status at <strong>the</strong> EU25 level. This shows that <strong>the</strong>re