View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 3 - Methods<br />
Participants<br />
Chapter 3 – Methods<br />
Six participants (five female, one male, age: 74 � 7 years), were recruited<br />
via the Auckland branch of the New Zealand Essential Tremor Support<br />
Group. Each participant had been clinically diagnosed as having ET by a<br />
neurologist (years diagnosed: 19 � 7 years, Table 2). To be eligible, no<br />
participant could have had a recent history of strength training, and<br />
mobility of the upper limb had to be normal. Participants continued with<br />
their current drug therapies and were requested to maintain this<br />
throughout the study. If medication change was directed by a<br />
neurologist then they were to notify researchers. Prior to the<br />
intervention each participant received an information sheet outlining<br />
the study and their rights as participants. Following this, written<br />
informed consent was given by participants. Participants were then<br />
screened and assessed using the American College of Sports Medicine<br />
risk stratification protocol for suitability to partake in an exercise<br />
programme (Franklin, et al., 2000).<br />
Experimental design<br />
This pilot study sought to examine the effect of general, upper limb RT<br />
on strength, hand and finger dexterity, and QoL in ET patients. To<br />
investigate this, a single group, dual pre-post quasi-experimental study<br />
design was used (as seen in Figure 2). This design was used due to the<br />
novelty of this pilot study and the relative difficulty in recruiting<br />
32