16.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 - Methods<br />

Participants<br />

Chapter 3 – Methods<br />

Six participants (five female, one male, age: 74 � 7 years), were recruited<br />

via the Auckland branch of the New Zealand Essential Tremor Support<br />

Group. Each participant had been clinically diagnosed as having ET by a<br />

neurologist (years diagnosed: 19 � 7 years, Table 2). To be eligible, no<br />

participant could have had a recent history of strength training, and<br />

mobility of the upper limb had to be normal. Participants continued with<br />

their current drug therapies and were requested to maintain this<br />

throughout the study. If medication change was directed by a<br />

neurologist then they were to notify researchers. Prior to the<br />

intervention each participant received an information sheet outlining<br />

the study and their rights as participants. Following this, written<br />

informed consent was given by participants. Participants were then<br />

screened and assessed using the American College of Sports Medicine<br />

risk stratification protocol for suitability to partake in an exercise<br />

programme (Franklin, et al., 2000).<br />

Experimental design<br />

This pilot study sought to examine the effect of general, upper limb RT<br />

on strength, hand and finger dexterity, and QoL in ET patients. To<br />

investigate this, a single group, dual pre-post quasi-experimental study<br />

design was used (as seen in Figure 2). This design was used due to the<br />

novelty of this pilot study and the relative difficulty in recruiting<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!