View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Quality of Life (ET Specific) - QUEST Chapter 4 – Results No significant changes were observed for any of the domains of ET- specific QUEST QoL measure between the two baseline testing (Pre 1 and Pre 2) occasions (p = 0.37 – 0.86). Following the six week RT period there were no significant changes at Post 1 or Post 2 compared to baseline. 57
Physical and Psychosocial Chapter 4 – Results Following the six week RT intervention there was no significant change for Physical (p = 0.48, ES = 0.27 ± 0.74) and Psychosocial scores (p = 0.94, ES 0.03 ± 0.90) QUEST scores (Figure 13). QUEST (change score percentage) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 Physical Psychosocial Figure 13: Performance in the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) Post 1 Post 2 questionnaire for Physical and Psychosocial domains. Post 1 and Post 2 data were calculated as change scores from pooled pre-exercise data and expressed as a percentage change of the pre-exercise data. Positive values indicate an increase of strength following the exercise intervention. Data are reported as means and 95% confidence intervals. 58
Page 1 and 2:
Can resistance training improve han
Page 3 and 4:
unrelated hospitalisation. Each par
Page 5 and 6:
Statement of Originality I hereby d
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Abstract ........
Page 9 and 10:
Figures Figure 1: Rationale for RT
Page 11 and 12:
Tables Table 1: Review of training
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 - Introduction ET is typi
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1 - Introduction number of
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2 - Literature Review Chapt
Page 19 and 20: Chapter 2 - Literature Review 2010)
Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2 - Literature Review diffi
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 2 - Literature Review Gait
Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2 - Literature Review inste
Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2 - Literature Review entra
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2 - Literature Review With
Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2 - Literature Review Louis
Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2 - Literature Review teach
Page 35 and 36: Chapter 2 - Literature Review RT co
Page 37 and 38: Chapter 2 - Literature Review inclu
Page 39 and 40: Condition/Tool Symptoms/Adaptations
Page 41 and 42: Chapter 2 - Literature Review Korna
Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3 - Methods Participants Ch
Page 45 and 46: Study Protocol 1 Week Figure 2: Stu
Page 47 and 48: Figure 3: Dumbbell elbow flexion Fi
Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3 - Methods correlation coe
Page 51 and 52: Chapter 3 - Methods Figure 6: PPT i
Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3 - Methods Takata, et al.,
Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3 - Methods Additionally, t
Page 57 and 58: Table 2: Participant demographics P
Page 59 and 60: Strength - 5RM Assessment Chapter 4
Page 61 and 62: Wrist flexion Chapter 4 - Results F
Page 63 and 64: Hand and finger dexterity - Purdue
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 4 - Results Following the s
Page 67: SF-36 (change score percentage) 80
Page 71 and 72: Work and Finance Chapter 4 - Result
Page 73 and 74: Chapter 5 - Discussion Often decrea
Page 75 and 76: Chapter 5 - Discussion reduce postu
Page 77 and 78: Chapter 5 - Discussion Significant
Page 79 and 80: Chapter 5 - Discussion than that us
Page 81 and 82: Chapter 6 - Study Limitations & Fut
Page 83 and 84: References References Adam, A., de
Page 85 and 86: References Cochrane, T., Munro, J.,
Page 87 and 88: References Elble, R. J., Pullman, S
Page 89 and 90: References Hirsch, M. A., Toole, T.
Page 91 and 92: References Lafayette Instrument Com
Page 93 and 94: References Lundervold, D. A., Belwo
Page 95 and 96: References International Journal of
Page 97 and 98: References tremor. Parkinsonism & R
Page 99 and 100: References Traub, R. E., Gerbin, M.
Page 101 and 102: Appendices Appendix A - Abbreviatio
Page 103 and 104: Appendix B 92
Page 105 and 106: 5RM - Wrist Flexion Most Affected L
Page 107 and 108: Hand and Finger dexterity PPT - Mos
Page 109 and 110: Quality of life - SF-36 SF36 - Gene
Page 111 and 112: SF36 - Role Emotional (%) Figure 30
Page 113 and 114: Quality of Life - QUEST Figure 34:
Page 115: QUEST - Work/Finance (%) 100.00 90.
show all

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?