16.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wrist flexion<br />

Chapter 4 – Results<br />

Following the six week RT intervention unilateral wrist flexion strength<br />

increased significantly by 44% for the most affected limb (p = 0.02, ES =<br />

0.75 ± 0.47) and 32% for the least affected limb (p = 0.02, ES = 0.49 ±<br />

0.25) (Figure 8).<br />

5RM Wrist Flexion<br />

(change score percentage)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

*<br />

Most affected<br />

*<br />

Least affected<br />

Post 1<br />

Post 2<br />

Figure 8: Performance in the 5 Repetition Maximum (5RM) Wrist Flexion Strength<br />

Assessment when using only the arm of most affected limb, and only the arm of the<br />

least affected limb. Post 1 and Post 2 data were calculated as change scores from<br />

pooled pre-exercise data and expressed as a percentage change of the pre-exercise<br />

data. Positive values indicate an increase of strength following the exercise<br />

intervention. Data are reported as means and 95% confidence intervals. * =<br />

Significant change (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!