17.01.2013 Views

Martin Teichmann Atomes de lithium-6 ultra froids dans la ... - TEL

Martin Teichmann Atomes de lithium-6 ultra froids dans la ... - TEL

Martin Teichmann Atomes de lithium-6 ultra froids dans la ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

occupation probability<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

2.4. BCS THEORY<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 0.5 1.0<br />

k=<br />

k<br />

1.5 2.0<br />

Figure 2.8: The momentum distribution in a homogeneous gas in the<br />

different limits of BCS theory. On the top the BCS limit, kFa = −1. The<br />

dashed line shows a Fermi gas at the critical temperature for comparison.<br />

The center line is the unitarity limit (1/kFa = 0) and the bottom line<br />

is the BEC limit (kFa = 1). The dotted lines are the predictions from<br />

Astrakharchik et al. [70].<br />

mean field fluctuations into account, revealed that the maximum visible<br />

in the figure should not exist, but the con<strong>de</strong>nsation temperature should<br />

increase steadily [69].<br />

2.4.6 Beyond BCS theory<br />

The use of BCS theory throughout the whole BEC-BCS crossover by<br />

Leggett was a bit adventurous, since the BCS approximations only hold<br />

for small attractive interactions. Nevertheless, his approach was justified<br />

<strong>la</strong>ter as his theory is a self-consistent theory which predicts experiments<br />

at least qualitatively.<br />

This success had raised the bar for further theoretical research. The<br />

problem is in<strong>de</strong>ed challenging: with the interactions being strong, we<br />

37<br />

F

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!