Martin Teichmann Atomes de lithium-6 ultra froids dans la ... - TEL
Martin Teichmann Atomes de lithium-6 ultra froids dans la ... - TEL
Martin Teichmann Atomes de lithium-6 ultra froids dans la ... - TEL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
occupation probability<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
2.4. BCS THEORY<br />
0.0<br />
0.0 0.5 1.0<br />
k=<br />
k<br />
1.5 2.0<br />
Figure 2.8: The momentum distribution in a homogeneous gas in the<br />
different limits of BCS theory. On the top the BCS limit, kFa = −1. The<br />
dashed line shows a Fermi gas at the critical temperature for comparison.<br />
The center line is the unitarity limit (1/kFa = 0) and the bottom line<br />
is the BEC limit (kFa = 1). The dotted lines are the predictions from<br />
Astrakharchik et al. [70].<br />
mean field fluctuations into account, revealed that the maximum visible<br />
in the figure should not exist, but the con<strong>de</strong>nsation temperature should<br />
increase steadily [69].<br />
2.4.6 Beyond BCS theory<br />
The use of BCS theory throughout the whole BEC-BCS crossover by<br />
Leggett was a bit adventurous, since the BCS approximations only hold<br />
for small attractive interactions. Nevertheless, his approach was justified<br />
<strong>la</strong>ter as his theory is a self-consistent theory which predicts experiments<br />
at least qualitatively.<br />
This success had raised the bar for further theoretical research. The<br />
problem is in<strong>de</strong>ed challenging: with the interactions being strong, we<br />
37<br />
F