20.01.2013 Views

Decision Models in Skiable Areas - EPFL

Decision Models in Skiable Areas - EPFL

Decision Models in Skiable Areas - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 MODEL OF DEMAND IN A SKIABLE AREA 12<br />

• M<strong>in</strong> has a negative sign. This is also <strong>in</strong>terpretable, <strong>in</strong> the way that a low ”M<strong>in</strong>”<br />

(M<strong>in</strong>LD = m<strong>in</strong>s∈SL D ls) is more attractive.<br />

• Prot has a positive sign and this means that a lift where the skiers are protected<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st the weather is more attractive. We have seen that this attribute co<strong>in</strong>cides<br />

with the characteristic to put off the skis. This means that the protection aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

the weather is more appreciated by the skiers than the disadvantage to put off the<br />

skis.<br />

• Seats has also a positive sign. A lift where the skiers can sit down is more<br />

attractive than one without the possibility to sit down.<br />

The sign of the coefficient Maxmax can not be <strong>in</strong>terpreted, because the positive sign of<br />

the attribute Max tells us that the skiers like the high-level ski slopes. So it could also<br />

be suspected that the coefficient Maxmax has a positive sign. Or, at least that the both<br />

coefficients have the same sign.<br />

Because the two attributes Manmax D O and P rotD has to be supposed random<br />

variables and because the sign of the coefficient Maxmax can not be <strong>in</strong>terpreted, it is<br />

likely that the Basic Model can be improved. The fact that the attributes Manmax D O<br />

and P rotD are random variables leads to the first approach, the time dependence of<br />

the coefficients M<strong>in</strong>max and Prot. This is described <strong>in</strong> section 6.1.3. The fact, that the<br />

sign of the coefficient Maxmax can not be <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tuitive way is, as already<br />

mentioned, the motivation of the second approach <strong>in</strong> section 6.1.4.<br />

6.1.3 First approach: Time dependence of ”M<strong>in</strong>max” and ”Prot”<br />

View that the coefficients ”M<strong>in</strong>max” and ”Prot” are random variables, a time dependence<br />

of this coefficients is proved. It is assumed that the coefficient <strong>in</strong> the determ<strong>in</strong>istic<br />

term correspond<strong>in</strong>g to M<strong>in</strong>max is<br />

�<br />

T ime<br />

M<strong>in</strong>max ·<br />

t0<br />

� λmo<br />

∀ T ime < t0<br />

where the time is measured <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>utes and t0 chosen to be 720, what correspond to<br />

noon (start<strong>in</strong>g at midnight). In the afternoon, we have<br />

�<br />

T ime<br />

M<strong>in</strong>max ·<br />

t0<br />

� λan<br />

∀ T ime ≥ t0<br />

An example of this function depend<strong>in</strong>g of the time is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 3 where<br />

M<strong>in</strong>max is set to 1, λmo and λan to -1.72 and 0.58 respectively. The parameters λmo<br />

and λan can also be estimated by Biogeme. The same approach is done <strong>in</strong> the case of<br />

the coefficient ”Prot”. This leads to two coefficients µmo and µan. All together, four<br />

additional parameters has to be estimated <strong>in</strong> this model.<br />

The result of this estimation is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 4. It can be observed that µmo<br />

is not significant and it reaches the lower bound of −5 which is very unrealistic. The<br />

attribute σan is also not significant. The failure of the t-test means that the hypotheses<br />

of time dependence of the two attributes has to be rejected. You can also remark that<br />

the sign of Maxmax is still negative. This is the reason, why we leave the strategy to<br />

ameliorate the attributes M<strong>in</strong>max and Prot. We rather look to change the model that<br />

Maxmax becomes a positive number (Or at least that Max and Maxmax have the same<br />

sign).<br />

(27)<br />

(28)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!