20.01.2013 Views

Decision Models in Skiable Areas - EPFL

Decision Models in Skiable Areas - EPFL

Decision Models in Skiable Areas - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 METHODOLOGY - DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS 4<br />

3 Methodology - Discrete Choice <strong>Models</strong><br />

This section is an <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong> discrete choice models, and some of them are expla<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Discrete choice models are used when an analyst wants to understand some<br />

human based decisions. Such models are often applied <strong>in</strong> transportation problems.<br />

3.1 <strong>Decision</strong> Maker<br />

The decision maker is considered to be an <strong>in</strong>dividual, like an person or a group of<br />

persons. In the case of a group, the decision is considered to be one of the whole entire<br />

group.<br />

For example, the decision maker can be a skier <strong>in</strong> a skiable area which has to decide<br />

between a set of lifts and ski slopes to cont<strong>in</strong>ue his trip.<br />

3.2 Alternatives<br />

The set of alternatives is called the choice set. This set may be cont<strong>in</strong>uous (or not<br />

enumerable), like the time to spend <strong>in</strong> a restaurant, or discrete, like a set of lifts. In<br />

discrete choice models, only f<strong>in</strong>ite choice sets a considered, therefor the name. It is<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guished between the universal choice set, noted C, and the reduced choice set.<br />

The universal choice set is the set of all possible alternatives that an <strong>in</strong>dividual can<br />

chose. The reduced choice set is associated to an particular <strong>in</strong>dividual and is the set of<br />

all possible alternatives for this <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> the actual situation.<br />

3.3 Attributes<br />

The attributes are a set of characteristics (an attribute) of the alternatives. They allow<br />

them to be different between them. Each attribute must take a measurable value. It is<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guished between generic and specific attributes. An generic attribute is one that<br />

can be measured for all alternatives while a specific attribute is one that exist only for<br />

a subset of alternatives.<br />

Example: The decision maker is a skier who has to choose his path. Suppose that<br />

the skier is at the end of a ski slope and that he has to choose the next lift of ski slope.<br />

The universal choice set is the set of all lifts and ski slopes. The reduced choice set is<br />

the set of all lifts and ski slopes that issues from his actual po<strong>in</strong>t. An generic attribute<br />

is the length of the lift resp. the ski slope. An specific attribute, def<strong>in</strong>ed for each lift,<br />

is the length of the queue of this one. An specific attribute, def<strong>in</strong>ed only for the ski<br />

slopes, is the level of difficulty.<br />

3.4 Random Utility <strong>Models</strong><br />

In discrete choice models, it exists a map which associates for each alternative (with<br />

the actual values of the attributes) and each <strong>in</strong>dividual a value, called utility U i a. It is<br />

a measurement of utility for the decision maker for each alternative. In discrete choice<br />

models, it is always assumed that the analyst don’t posses the complete <strong>in</strong>formation. It<br />

is caused to unobserved attributes and measurement errors. So the utility is considered<br />

to be a random variable composed of two components<br />

U i a = V i<br />

a + ε i a<br />

(1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!