assumptions: that eye glances are related to attention and/or distraction and that there are generally accepted safety criteria for excessive eye glances away from the roadway ahead. <strong>The</strong>se assumptions are not universally accepted. In summary, the basic research question is whether the presence <strong>of</strong> CEVMS along the roadway is associated with a reduction in driving safety for the public. <strong>The</strong> three fundamental methods for answering this question include if there is an increase in crash rates in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> CEVMS, if there is an increase in near-crashes or safety surrogate measures in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> CEVMS, and if there are excessive eye glances away from the roadway ahead in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> CEVMS. 1.2 SCOPE In this report, a CEVMS will be defined as a self-luminous advertising sign which depicts any kind <strong>of</strong> light, color, or message change which ranges from static images to image sequences to full motion video. <strong>The</strong> CEVMS may also be referred to as an <strong>Electronic</strong> Billboard (EBB) or a Digital Billboard (DBB). <strong>The</strong> present report concentrates on the possible effects <strong>of</strong> CEVMS on driver attention, driver distraction, and roadway safety. <strong>The</strong> report is divided into 10 sections: Introduction, Literature Review Update, Key Factors and Measures, Research Strategies, Future Research Program, Recommended First Stage Study, Conclusions, References, Bibliography, and Appendices. Investigating the possible safety effects <strong>of</strong> CEVMS is sufficiently complex so that no single experiment will answer all <strong>of</strong> the relevant scientific and engineering questions. <strong>The</strong> present report outlines a top-level broad program <strong>of</strong> potential future research, and it defines in greater detail three possible studies, any one <strong>of</strong> which could serve as a possible first step. After these discussions, a course <strong>of</strong> action is recommended. Although <strong>of</strong>f-premise advertising signs constitute the main focus <strong>of</strong> FHWA attention, the influence <strong>of</strong> on-premise advertising signs will also be considered to create a more comprehensive and consistent research approach. In parallel with the present project, a related study is being performed under National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 20-7 (256), titled “Safety Impacts <strong>of</strong> the Emerging Digital Display Technology for Outdoor Advertising <strong>Signs</strong>.” Both the present project and the NCHRP study begin with the understanding that, despite years <strong>of</strong> research, there have been no definitive conclusions about the presence or strength <strong>of</strong> adverse safety impacts from CEVMS. <strong>The</strong> two projects differ in three significant ways. First, the NCHRP study is undertaking a broad, critical review <strong>of</strong> the research literature in this field. <strong>The</strong> present project is more focused on literature update oriented toward the identification <strong>of</strong> suitable independent and dependent variables for future research. Second, the NCHRP study is reviewing current regulations and guidelines for the control <strong>of</strong> roadside advertising that may exist in foreign countries to assess their applicability to U.S. highways and streets. Aside from mention in the literature review update portion, the present report does not directly address regulations and guidelines. Third, the NCHRP study will synthesize current research results and current regulations and guidance to recommend how State and local governments might enact reasonable temporary guidance for the control <strong>of</strong> CEVMS within their own jurisdictions. Such guidance may be applicable on an interim basis pending the outcome <strong>of</strong> future, more conclusive research outlined in the present project. As a result, such interim guidance may need to change as new 2
technical information is developed. <strong>The</strong> present report does not provide guidance to States on the control <strong>of</strong> CEVMS. 3
- Page 1 and 2: The Effects of Commercial Electroni
- Page 3 and 4: TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.
- Page 7: LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Expanded ke
- Page 13 and 14: 2.1 BACKGROUND 2.0 LITERATURE REVIE
- Page 15 and 16: inattention and/or distraction as a
- Page 17 and 18: vehicle along a route which is cont
- Page 19 and 20: vehicle” (p. 17). (19) Chan et al
- Page 21 and 22: 2.6 REVIEWS OF PRACTICE Bergeron al
- Page 23 and 24: The present literature review does
- Page 25: cause a distraction at an inopportu
- Page 28 and 29: • Luminance [1.2.4] (brightness).
- Page 30 and 31: (nearby billboards). In particular,
- Page 32 and 33: As mentioned above, the more detail
- Page 34 and 35: • Closed-course test track [3.4]
- Page 37 and 38: 5.0 FUTURE RESEARCH PROGRAM As stat
- Page 39 and 40: 5.3 STRUCTURE As outlined above, th
- Page 41: statistics. The Empirical Bayes met
- Page 44 and 45: deviation, and traffic conflicts. A
- Page 46 and 47: The on-road instrumented vehicle me
- Page 49 and 50: APPENDIX A—EXPANDED TABLES A.1 KE
- Page 51 and 52: Variable Ref. # Advantages Disadvan
- Page 53 and 54: Variable Ref. # Advantages Disadvan
- Page 55 and 56: A.2 KEY MEASURES (DEPENDENT VARIABL
- Page 57 and 58: Variable Ref. # Advantages Disadvan
- Page 59 and 60: Variable Ref. # Advantages Disadvan
- Page 61 and 62:
A.3 KEY RESEARCH STRATEGIES Table 3
- Page 63 and 64:
Method Ref. # Advantages Disadvanta
- Page 65 and 66:
Method Ref. # Advantages Disadvanta
- Page 67:
Method Ref. # Advantages Disadvanta
- Page 70 and 71:
The primary measure or dependent va
- Page 72 and 73:
connected to the vehicle data bus s
- Page 74 and 75:
B.3 UNOBTRUSIVE OBSERVATION APPROAC
- Page 77:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The present projec
- Page 80 and 81:
11. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Nea
- Page 83 and 84:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Ady, R.W. (1967).
- Page 85 and 86:
28. Claus, K.E. (1974). “Psycholo
- Page 87 and 88:
54. Gellatly, A.W. and Kleiss, J.A.
- Page 89 and 90:
80. Kuhn, B.T. (1999). “The Impac
- Page 91 and 92:
106. Parkes, A.M, Ward, N.J., and V
- Page 93 and 94:
131. Tantala, M. and Tantala, P. (2
- Page 95 and 96:
155. Wierwille, W.W., Antin, J.F.,