The Effects of Commercial Electronic Variable Message Signs ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

118. Rockwell, T.H. (1988). “Spare Visual Capacity in Driving-Revisited (New Empirical Results for an Old Idea).” In Proceeding of Vision in Vehicles II (317-324). Gale, A.G. et a1. (Editors). Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland). 119. Rumar, K. (1990). “The Basic Driver Error: Late decision.” Ergonomics, 33(10/11), 1281–1290. 120. Rusch, W.A. (1951). “Highway Accident Rates as Related to Roads Business and Advertising.” Highway Research Board. Highway Research Board Bulletin, 30, 46–50. Washington, DC. 121. Rykken, K.B. (1951). “Minnesota Roadside Survey: Progress Report on Accident, Access Point and Advertising Sign Study in Minnesota.” Highway Research Board Bulletin, 30, 42–43. 122. Schollerer, E., Stricker, D., Sury, P., Groner, R., and Groner, M. (2007). “Driving and Advertisements: A Simulator Study with Eye Movements Recorded.” Universitat Bern. Bern, Switzerland. 123. Serafin, C., Wen, C., Paelke, P., and Green, P. (1993). “Car Phone Usability: A Human Factors Laboratory Test.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 220–224. Santa Monica, CA. 124. Shoaf, R.T. (1955). “Are Advertising Signs Near Freeways Traffic Hazards?” Traffic Engineering, 26(2), 71–76. 125. Smiley, A., Persaud, B., Bahar, G., Mollett, C., Lyon, C., Smahel, T., et al. (2005). “Traffic Safety Evaluation of Video Advertising Signs.” Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.TRB.1937, 105–112. Washington, DC. 126. Smiley, A., Smahel, T., and Eizenman, M. (2004). “Impact of Video Advertising on Driver Fixation Patterns.” Transportation Research Record, 1899, 76–83. 127. Staffeld, P.R. (1953). “Accidents Related to Access Points and Advertising Signs in Study.” Traffic Quarterly, 7(1), 59–74. 128. Stutts, J.C., Reinfurt, D.W., Staplin, L., and Rodgman, E.A. (2001). “The Role of Driver Distraction in Traffic Crashes.” Report Prepared for AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Washington, DC. 129. SWOV. (2006). “Advertising and Information Alongside the Road.” SWOV (Institute for Road Safety Research) Fact Sheet. Leidschendam, The Netherlands. 130. Tantala Sr., A.M. and Tantala, M.W. (2007). “A Study of the Relationship Between Digital Billboards and Traffic Safety in Cuyahoga County Ohio.” Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education. Washington, DC. 84
131. Tantala, M. and Tantala, P. (2005). “An Examination of the Relationship Between Advertising Signs and Traffic Safety.” Presented at the 84 th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC. 132. Theeuwes, J. (1996). “Visual Search at Intersections: An Eye-Movement Analysis.” In: A.G. Gale, I. Brown, C. Haslegrave, and S. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles: VI. North Holland Press, Elsevier Science Publishers. New York, NY. 133. Theeuwes, J. and Hagenzieker, P. (1993). “Visual Search of Traffic Scenes: On The Effect of Location Expectations.” Vision in Vehicles—IV, A.G. Gale et al. editors, Elsevier Science Publishers BV. 134. Thompson-Kuhn, B., Garvey, P.M., and Pietrucha, K.M. (1997). “Model Guidelines for Visibility of On-Premise Advertisement Signs.” National Academy Press. Transportation Research Record, No. 1605. Washington, DC. 135. Tijerina, L., Kiger, S. M., Rockwell, T.H., and Tornow, C. (1995). “Workload Assessment of In-Cab Text Message System and Cellular Phone Use by Heavy Vehicle Drivers on the Road.” In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39 th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1117–1121. Santa Monica, CA. 136. Tijerina, L., Palmer, E.B., and Goodman, M.J. (1999). “Individual Differences and In- Vehicle Distraction While Driving: A Test Track Study and Psychometric Evaluation.” In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43 rd Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 982–986. Santa Monica, CA. 137. Transportation Environment Consultants. (1989). “Review of Roadside Advertising Signs. Roads and Traffic Authority.” Sydney, Australia. 138. Transportation Environment Consultants. (1990). “Evaluation of Banner Advertising for Safety Promotion.” Roads and Traffic Authority. Sydney, Australia. 139. Treat, J.R., Tumbas, N.S., McDonald, S.T., Shinar, D., Hume, R.D., Mayer, R.E., et al. (1979). “Tri-Level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents.” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Washington, DC. 140. TRL Information Centre (2007). “Variable Message Signs Update. Current Topics in Transport.” TRL Limited. Berkshire, United Kingdom. 141. Violanti, J.M. (1996). “Cellular Phones and Fatal Traffic Collisions.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 30(4), 519–524. 142. Wachtel, J. (1981). “Electronic Advertising Along Highways—Concern for Traffic Safety.” Public Roads, 45(1), 1–5. 143. Wachtel, J. (2008). “A Critical, comprehensive Review of Two Studies Recently Released by the Outdoor Advertising Association of America—Final Report.” Maryland 85
Page 1 and 2:
The Effects of Commercial Electroni
Page 3 and 4:
TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.
Page 7:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Expanded ke
Page 10 and 11:
assumptions: that eye glances are r
Page 13 and 14:
2.1 BACKGROUND 2.0 LITERATURE REVIE
Page 15 and 16:
inattention and/or distraction as a
Page 17 and 18:
vehicle along a route which is cont
Page 19 and 20:
vehicle” (p. 17). (19) Chan et al
Page 21 and 22:
2.6 REVIEWS OF PRACTICE Bergeron al
Page 23 and 24:
The present literature review does
Page 25:
cause a distraction at an inopportu
Page 28 and 29:
• Luminance [1.2.4] (brightness).
Page 30 and 31:
(nearby billboards). In particular,
Page 32 and 33:
As mentioned above, the more detail
Page 34 and 35:
• Closed-course test track [3.4]
Page 37 and 38:
5.0 FUTURE RESEARCH PROGRAM As stat
Page 39 and 40:
5.3 STRUCTURE As outlined above, th
Page 41: statistics. The Empirical Bayes met
Page 44 and 45: deviation, and traffic conflicts. A
Page 46 and 47: The on-road instrumented vehicle me
Page 49 and 50: APPENDIX A—EXPANDED TABLES A.1 KE
Page 51 and 52: Variable Ref. # Advantages Disadvan
Page 55 and 56: A.2 KEY MEASURES (DEPENDENT VARIABL
Page 61 and 62: A.3 KEY RESEARCH STRATEGIES Table 3
Page 63 and 64: Method Ref. # Advantages Disadvanta
Page 65 and 66: Method Ref. # Advantages Disadvanta
Page 67: Method Ref. # Advantages Disadvanta
Page 70 and 71: The primary measure or dependent va
Page 72 and 73: connected to the vehicle data bus s
Page 74 and 75: B.3 UNOBTRUSIVE OBSERVATION APPROAC
Page 77: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The present projec
Page 80 and 81: 11. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Nea
Page 83 and 84: BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Ady, R.W. (1967).
Page 85 and 86: 28. Claus, K.E. (1974). “Psycholo
Page 87 and 88: 54. Gellatly, A.W. and Kleiss, J.A.
Page 89 and 90: 80. Kuhn, B.T. (1999). “The Impac
Page 91: 106. Parkes, A.M, Ward, N.J., and V
Page 95 and 96: 155. Wierwille, W.W., Antin, J.F.,
show all

The Effects of Commercial Electronic Variable Message Signs ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?