25.01.2013 Views

Conditioning Agents for Hair and Skin

Conditioning Agents for Hair and Skin

Conditioning Agents for Hair and Skin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

124 Carson <strong>and</strong> Gallagher<br />

oilier-feeling ester or, if the molecular weight is high enough, an ester with a<br />

waxier feel.<br />

In our example of the simple ester IPM, we treated it like a single chemical<br />

entity. It must be stressed that this is typically not the case <strong>for</strong> cosmetic ingredients.<br />

Usually, an ester like IPM consists of isopropyl esters of a variety of<br />

fatty acids. IPM consists mainly, but not exclusively, of isopropyl esters myristic<br />

acid. Also present, depending on the fatty acid distribution of the starting<br />

material, will be quantities of isopropyl laurate, palmitate, <strong>and</strong> stearate. This<br />

fact is often overlooked in the comparisons of emollient esters since these<br />

comparisons are most often per<strong>for</strong>med on the commercially available materials.<br />

Such comparisons are practically useful, but they often are filled with ambiguity,<br />

or at the least imprecision, when they are used <strong>for</strong> the scientific purpose<br />

of relating the structure of the ester to per<strong>for</strong>mance. We need to keep<br />

these limitations in mind when reviewing such in<strong>for</strong>mation. These limitations,<br />

however, do not prevent us from making useful generalizations or interpretations<br />

based upon our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the individual components.<br />

The straight-chain, saturated fatty acids typically used in simple emollient<br />

esters range from lauric (Cizio) acid to stearic (Ci8:o) acid. Shorter hydrocarbon<br />

chains are not capable of delivering the nongreasy, lubricating emollient feel<br />

associated with cosmetic esters. Higher hydrocarbon chains are likely to produce<br />

esters with melting points well above skin temperature. It is difficult to<br />

consider these esters as emollients; they are probably better categorized as wax<br />

esters. Of course, the simple esters can also be based on unsaturated fatty acids<br />

such as oleic (Cis:i) <strong>and</strong> linoleic (Cisa) acids, as well as the less common palmitoleic<br />

(Ci6:i) acid.<br />

Although specific comparative data <strong>for</strong> the isopropyl esters are not complete,<br />

based on the in<strong>for</strong>mation available we can make some generalizations<br />

concerning these straight-chain fatty chains. As the molecular weight of the<br />

isopropyl esters increases, so do the solidification or melt point, viscosity, surface<br />

tension, <strong>and</strong> amount of ester that persists on the skin after 1 or 2 hours<br />

(Table 6).<br />

With regard to the correlation of the skin feel of these esters in <strong>for</strong>mulations<br />

to their chemical structure, the "Rosetta Stone" of such in<strong>for</strong>mation is still the<br />

Goldemberg Article. In this paper, various esters are compared <strong>for</strong> their "initial<br />

slip" <strong>and</strong> "end feel" in a simple oil-in-water emulsion. Goldemberg notes<br />

that the isopropyl esters were often ranked the best in each series of esters<br />

studied. The data suggest that although the feel properties of the myristate<br />

<strong>and</strong> palmitate are very similar, the myristate scored slightly higher in initial<br />

slip but slightly lower in end feel. Perhaps the most interesting observation is<br />

that the isopropyl linoleate (Cisa) ester is significantly poorer <strong>for</strong> both initial<br />

slip <strong>and</strong> end feel. Perhaps this is why the saturated-chain <strong>and</strong> branched-chain<br />

isopropyl esters have been preferred in actual use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!