28.01.2013 Views

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

262 Waves<br />

to using such coordinate systems:<br />

. <strong>The</strong> volume integrals separate into radial and angular parts which can be carried<br />

out independently. This leads to economies in computation.<br />

. <strong>The</strong> radial integration is identical for every such in®nite element, so that the only<br />

integration which needs to be carried out for every in®nite element is along the<br />

®nite element interface.<br />

. <strong>The</strong> radial integration is the only part containing the wave number.<br />

. <strong>The</strong> ellipsoidal coordinates can be used to enclose a large variety of di€erent<br />

geometries in the ®nite element interior, while still retaining a guarantee of<br />

convergence in 3D.<br />

<strong>The</strong> angular shape functions are written in the conventional polynomial form. <strong>The</strong><br />

radial shape functions take the form<br />

Xm<br />

ÿ ikr<br />

Ni ˆ e<br />

j ˆ 1<br />

h ij<br />

…kr† j<br />

…8:40†<br />

<strong>The</strong> coe cients h ij are given from the condition of circumferential compatibility<br />

between adjacent in®nite elements. <strong>The</strong>re is e€ectively no di€erence between this<br />

radial behaviour and that originally proposed in the mapped in®nite wave elements<br />

by Bettess et al. 45;46 <strong>The</strong> di€erence in the in®nite element methodology lies in the<br />

fact that the radial variable, r, is now in ellipsoidal coordinates. Burnett and<br />

Holford 51ÿ53 give the necessary detailed information for the element integrations<br />

and the programming of these in®nite elements, together with some results. <strong>The</strong><br />

analytical expressions are too long to include here. <strong>The</strong> elements have been used on<br />

submarine ¯uid±st<strong>ru</strong>cture interaction problems, and substantial e ciencies over<br />

the use of boundary integral models for the scattered waves have been claimed. In<br />

one case Burnett states that the ®nite and in®nite element model ran for 7 hours on<br />

a workstation. His projected time for the corresponding boundary element model<br />

was about 3000 hours, the in®nite elements giving a dramatic improvement!<br />

<strong>The</strong> Burnett elements have been tested up to very short-wave cases, up to ka ˆ 100<br />

for an elastic sphere di€raction problem, which is shown in Fig. 8.8.<br />

8.13 Wave envelope in®nite elements<br />

Astley introduced a new type of ®nite element, in which the weighting function is the<br />

complex conjugate of the shape function. 19;20 <strong>The</strong> great simpli®cation which this<br />

introduces is that the oscillatory function exp…ikr† cancels after being multiplied by<br />

exp…ÿikr†, and the remaining terms are all polynomials, which can be integrated<br />

using standard techniques, like Gauss±Legendre integration (see <strong>Vol</strong>ume 1, Chapter<br />

9). This type of element was originally large (i.e. many wavelengths in extent), but not<br />

in®nite. Figure 8.9 shows an example from acoustics, that of acoustical pressure in a<br />

hyperbolic duct. Good results were obtained despite using a relatively coarse mesh.<br />

Astley's shape function was of the form<br />

N i…r; † r i<br />

r eÿik…r ÿ r i†<br />

…8:41†

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!