28.01.2013 Views

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

296 Appendix B<br />

5. While the piecewise polynomial basis fN 1 1; ...; N n p 1 ; ...; N n 1; ...; N n p n g contains<br />

complete polynomials from degree zero up to p ˆ p min e p e, numerical experiments<br />

indicate that stability demands p 5 2, in general.<br />

6. <strong>The</strong> DGM is elementwise conservative while the standard ®nite element approximation<br />

is conservative only in element patches. In particular, for any element e,<br />

we always have<br />

…<br />

e<br />

d ^ xe f dx ‡ k ˆ 0 …B:11†<br />

dx xe ÿ 1<br />

This property holds for arbitrarily high-order approximations p e.<br />

<strong>The</strong> DGM is robust and essentially free of the global spurious oscillations of<br />

continuous Galerkin approximations when applied to convection±di€usion<br />

problems.<br />

We now consider the solution to a convection±di€usion problem with a turning<br />

point in the middle of the domain. <strong>The</strong> Hemker problem is given as follows:<br />

k d2<br />

‡ x<br />

dx2 d<br />

dx ˆÿk 2 cos… x†ÿ x sin… x† on ‰0; 1Š<br />

with …ÿ1† ˆÿ2, …1† ˆ0. Exact solution for above shows a discontinuity of<br />

p p<br />

…x† ˆcos… x†‡erf…x= 2k†=erf…1=<br />

2k†<br />

Figures B.1 and B.2 show the solutions to the above problem …k ˆ 10 ÿ10 and<br />

h ˆ 1=10† obtained with the continuous and discontinuous Galerkin method,<br />

respectively. Extension to two and three dimensions is discussed in references given<br />

in Chapter 2.<br />

u<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

–0.5<br />

–1.0<br />

–1.5<br />

–2.0<br />

Exact<br />

p = 2<br />

p = 3<br />

p = 4<br />

p = 5<br />

–2.5<br />

–1.0 –0.6 –0.2 0<br />

x<br />

0.2 0.6 1.0<br />

Fig. B1. Continuous Galerkin approximation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!