28.01.2013 Views

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. Vol. 3. The finite - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 Convection dominated problems<br />

changing the central ®nite di€erence form of the approximation to the governing<br />

equation as given by Eq. (2.15) to<br />

…ÿ2Pe ÿ 1† ~ i ÿ 1 ‡…2 ‡ 2Pe† ~ i ÿ ~ i ‡ 1 ‡ Qh2<br />

ˆ 0 …2:20†<br />

k<br />

With this upwind di€erence approximation, realistic (though not always accurate)<br />

solutions can be obtained through the whole range of Peclet numbers of the example<br />

of Fig. 2.2 as shown there by curves labelled ˆ 1. However, now exact nodal solutions<br />

are only obtained for pure convection …Pe ˆ1†, as shown in Fig. 2.2, in a similar<br />

way as the Galerkin ®nite element form gives exact nodal answers for pure di€usion.<br />

How can such upwind di€erencing be introduced into the ®nite element scheme and<br />

generalized to more complex situations? This is the problem that we shall now<br />

address, and indeed will show that again, as in self-adjoint equations, the ®nite<br />

element solution can result in exact nodal values for the one-dimensional approximation<br />

for all Peclet numbers.<br />

2.2.2 Petrov±Galerkin methods for upwinding in one dimension<br />

<strong>The</strong> ®rst possibility is that of the use of a Petrov±Galerkin type of weighting in which<br />

Wi 6ˆ Ni. 6ÿ9 Such weightings were ®rst suggested by <strong>Zienkiewicz</strong> et al. 6 in 1975 and<br />

used by Christie et al. 7 In particular, again for elements with linear shape functions<br />

Ni, shown in Fig. 2.1, we shall take, as shown in Fig. 2.3, weighting functions<br />

const<strong>ru</strong>cted so that<br />

Wi ˆ Ni ‡ Wi …2:21†<br />

where Wi is such that<br />

…<br />

Wi dx ˆ h<br />

…2:22†<br />

2<br />

N i<br />

W i *<br />

or<br />

h<br />

e<br />

Fig. 2.3 Petrov±Galerkin weight function W i ˆ N i ‡ W i . Continuous and discontinuous de®nitions.<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!