28.01.2013 Views

The Use and Calibration of the Kern ME5000 Mekometer - SLAC ...

The Use and Calibration of the Kern ME5000 Mekometer - SLAC ...

The Use and Calibration of the Kern ME5000 Mekometer - SLAC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Wben it was introduced in 1986 <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kern</strong> <strong>ME5000</strong> <strong>Mekometer</strong> immediately attracted attention from<br />

<strong>the</strong> survey groups <strong>of</strong> accelerator laboratories around <strong>the</strong> world. This interest was generated not only<br />

because <strong>the</strong> ‘<strong>ME5000</strong> <strong>of</strong>fered bigber accuracy than any o<strong>the</strong>r distance measuring instrument on -<strong>the</strong><br />

market, but also because, unlike previous instruments, its measuring range extended down to just a few<br />

meters, thus opening up <strong>the</strong> wbole realm <strong>of</strong> accelerator housings to high-accuracy EDM measurements.<br />

Abbougb <strong>Kern</strong> quoted a range <strong>of</strong> 20-8000 m, s<strong>of</strong>tware was quickly made available to extend <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement range below 20 m (<strong>the</strong> PROMEKO program developed by <strong>the</strong> Technical University <strong>of</strong><br />

Munich).<br />

In 1988-89 three DOE laboratories (CEBAF, FNAL <strong>and</strong> LBL) acquired instruments. ‘Since none <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se laboratories bad equipment to calibrate <strong>the</strong>se instruments whereas <strong>SLAC</strong> did, extensive tests were<br />

made witb all three instruments at <strong>SLAC</strong> in 1989.’ When four o<strong>the</strong>r laboratories initiated tbe<br />

procurement process in tbe second half <strong>of</strong> 1991 to buy <strong>the</strong>ir own machines, plans were set in motion to<br />

make a full series <strong>of</strong> test measurements with all DOE instruments, bringing <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>SLAC</strong> one at a time.<br />

Measurements commenced in January 1992 when <strong>the</strong> LBL, FNAL <strong>and</strong> CEBAF insmmrents were<br />

measured in quick succession. Tbe ANL <strong>and</strong> BNL instruments, both new, followed in February <strong>and</strong><br />

March. In June <strong>SLAC</strong> received its own instrument <strong>and</strong> measurements began right away.<br />

As what was to have been <strong>the</strong> culmination <strong>of</strong> this project, a workshop was held at <strong>SLAC</strong> in mid-June<br />

to discuss tbe results. 16 people from 7 DOE laboratories attended as well as one representative from <strong>the</strong><br />

Pohang Light Source in Korea (see <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> participants on p. iv). By this time measurements were<br />

complete for five instruments <strong>and</strong> mostly complete for a sixth (<strong>the</strong> <strong>SLAC</strong> instrument). This volume is <strong>the</strong><br />

for@ record <strong>of</strong> tbesix papers that were presented during <strong>the</strong> two days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> workshop. Tbe first paper<br />

covers <strong>ME5000</strong> Operation - how <strong>the</strong> instrument works. <strong>The</strong> second describes <strong>the</strong> measurements that were<br />

made at <strong>SLAC</strong> with eacbinstrument. Data analysis is described in <strong>the</strong> third <strong>and</strong> fourth papers, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

results are presented in <strong>the</strong> fifth paper. <strong>The</strong> final paper is a special invited paper commissioned from<br />

Chris Curtis <strong>of</strong> CEBAF who spent three years (1987-89) working with a <strong>ME5000</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Channel Tunnel<br />

project in Engl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Workshop proved not to be tbe culmination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project for two more instruments were<br />

measured in August - <strong>the</strong> two SSC instruments. <strong>The</strong> workshop papers presented in this volume have heen<br />

updated to incorporate <strong>the</strong>se results. <strong>The</strong> baseline measurements for tbe <strong>SLAC</strong> instrument have not heen<br />

completed <strong>and</strong> sufficient time has elapsed that <strong>the</strong>y must be started afresh, something that is not feasible<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next few months. <strong>The</strong>se updated proceedings <strong>the</strong>refore represent <strong>the</strong> culmination <strong>of</strong> this project to<br />

test tbe <strong>ME5000</strong> instruments at use in each DOE laboratory.<br />

<strong>SLAC</strong><br />

September 22,1992<br />

’ T.W. Copel<strong>and</strong>-Davis, Can <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kern</strong> <strong>ME5000</strong> Mekometa Replace Invar Measuremnts? Rcpulu<br />

Machines, Procedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> First Intemational Wonkshop on AccelcrtirAlignmmt, <strong>SLAC</strong>, July 31 - August 2, 1989, pp. 171-183.<br />

7<br />

d Test ~mmnts witi l’hree

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!