30.01.2013 Views

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(c) Australia<br />

which may arise relating to the giving effect to advance directives to<br />

refuse medical treatment.”<br />

3.32 In Queensland, a rather c<strong>on</strong>fusing statutory situati<strong>on</strong> exists, whereby<br />

two provisi<strong>on</strong>s appear to govern the situati<strong>on</strong> relating to capacity. First,<br />

Schedule 3 of the Queensland Powers of Attorney Act 1998 states that a<br />

pers<strong>on</strong> is regarded as having capacity if he or she is capable of understanding<br />

the nature and effects of decisi<strong>on</strong>s, can freely and voluntarily make decisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

and can communicate the decisi<strong>on</strong> in some way. Under 42 of the 1998 Act, an<br />

adult can <strong>on</strong>ly make an advance directive if he or she understands the following<br />

matters:<br />

i) “the nature and likely effects of each directi<strong>on</strong> in the advance health<br />

directive;<br />

ii) a directi<strong>on</strong> operates <strong>on</strong>ly while the principal has impaired capacity for<br />

the matter covered by the directi<strong>on</strong>;<br />

iii) the principal may revoke a directi<strong>on</strong> at any time the principal has<br />

capacity for the matter covered by the directi<strong>on</strong>;<br />

iv) at any time the principal is not capable of revoking a directi<strong>on</strong>, the<br />

principal is unable to effectively oversee the implementati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

directi<strong>on</strong>.”<br />

The Queensland 1998 Act does not clarify how the two provisi<strong>on</strong>s interrelate.<br />

Willmott submits that a possible interpretati<strong>on</strong> is that secti<strong>on</strong> 42 sets out a n<strong>on</strong>exhaustive<br />

list of matters that an adult must be able to understand in order to<br />

satisfy the Schedule 3 test of „capacity‟. 54 In order to be enforceable, an<br />

advance health directive must also include a certificate that is signed and dated<br />

by a doctor attesting to the fact that the maker had the necessary capacity to<br />

complete the document at the time of making it. 55<br />

(d) C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

3.33 In the wake of Laffoy‟s J comments in Fitzpatrick v FK, it is clear that<br />

guidance <strong>on</strong> the issue of capacity is required for healthcare decisi<strong>on</strong>s. Such<br />

guidance could come from the Commissi<strong>on</strong>‟s proposed Working Group <strong>on</strong><br />

54 Willmott “Advance Directives to Withhold Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment:<br />

Eroding Aut<strong>on</strong>omy Through Statutory <strong>Reform</strong>” (2007) 10(2) Flinders Journal of<br />

<strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> 287 at 291.<br />

55 Secti<strong>on</strong> 44(6) of the Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld).<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!