Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the 1987 Act c<strong>on</strong>tains a presumpti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerning the harmful effect of<br />
any substances or preparati<strong>on</strong> administered. 116<br />
5.45 It is clear that some of these features of the 1987 Act are specific to<br />
the c<strong>on</strong>text of clinical trials, but they provide some useful elements which might<br />
be included in a statutory scheme for advance care directives.<br />
(2) England and Wales<br />
(a) Mental Capacity Act 2005<br />
5.46 In its 1995 Report, the <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> of England and Wales made<br />
two recommendati<strong>on</strong>s with regard to the liability of health care providers. 117<br />
First, it recommended that no pers<strong>on</strong> should incur liability for the c<strong>on</strong>sequences<br />
of withholding any treatment or procedure if he or she has reas<strong>on</strong>able grounds<br />
for believing that an advance refusal of treatment applies. It noted that although<br />
this was the present law, the importance of the rule was such that it should be<br />
set out in the proposed statute. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, it recommended that no pers<strong>on</strong> should<br />
incur liability for carrying out any treatment or procedure to which an advance<br />
refusal applies unless he or she has reas<strong>on</strong>able grounds for believing that an<br />
advance refusal applies.<br />
5.47 At first glance, secti<strong>on</strong> 26 of the English Mental Capacity Act 2005<br />
appears to incorporate both recommendati<strong>on</strong>s of the <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>. Secti<strong>on</strong><br />
26(3) states that:<br />
“ a pers<strong>on</strong> does not incur liability for the c<strong>on</strong>sequences of withholding<br />
or withdrawing a treatment from [the maker of the decisi<strong>on</strong>] if, at the<br />
time, he reas<strong>on</strong>ably believes that an advance decisi<strong>on</strong> exists which is<br />
valid and applicable to the treatment.” 118<br />
In a similar vein, secti<strong>on</strong> 26(2) of the 2005 Act states that:<br />
“a pers<strong>on</strong> does not incur liability for carrying out or c<strong>on</strong>tinuing the<br />
treatment unless, at the time, he is satisfied that an advance decisi<strong>on</strong><br />
exists which is valid and applicable to the treatment.” 119<br />
115 Secti<strong>on</strong> 13(1)(b) of the C<strong>on</strong>trol of Clinical Trials Act 1987.<br />
116 Secti<strong>on</strong> 14 of the C<strong>on</strong>trol of Clinical Trials Act 1987.<br />
117 The <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> for England and Wales Report <strong>on</strong> Mental Incapacity (No<br />
231 1995) at paragraph 5.27.<br />
118 Emphasis added. See also Mental Capacity Act 2005 – Code of Practice at<br />
paragraph 9.59.<br />
119 Emphasis added.<br />
142