30.01.2013 Views

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the 1987 Act c<strong>on</strong>tains a presumpti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerning the harmful effect of<br />

any substances or preparati<strong>on</strong> administered. 116<br />

5.45 It is clear that some of these features of the 1987 Act are specific to<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>text of clinical trials, but they provide some useful elements which might<br />

be included in a statutory scheme for advance care directives.<br />

(2) England and Wales<br />

(a) Mental Capacity Act 2005<br />

5.46 In its 1995 Report, the <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> of England and Wales made<br />

two recommendati<strong>on</strong>s with regard to the liability of health care providers. 117<br />

First, it recommended that no pers<strong>on</strong> should incur liability for the c<strong>on</strong>sequences<br />

of withholding any treatment or procedure if he or she has reas<strong>on</strong>able grounds<br />

for believing that an advance refusal of treatment applies. It noted that although<br />

this was the present law, the importance of the rule was such that it should be<br />

set out in the proposed statute. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, it recommended that no pers<strong>on</strong> should<br />

incur liability for carrying out any treatment or procedure to which an advance<br />

refusal applies unless he or she has reas<strong>on</strong>able grounds for believing that an<br />

advance refusal applies.<br />

5.47 At first glance, secti<strong>on</strong> 26 of the English Mental Capacity Act 2005<br />

appears to incorporate both recommendati<strong>on</strong>s of the <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>. Secti<strong>on</strong><br />

26(3) states that:<br />

“ a pers<strong>on</strong> does not incur liability for the c<strong>on</strong>sequences of withholding<br />

or withdrawing a treatment from [the maker of the decisi<strong>on</strong>] if, at the<br />

time, he reas<strong>on</strong>ably believes that an advance decisi<strong>on</strong> exists which is<br />

valid and applicable to the treatment.” 118<br />

In a similar vein, secti<strong>on</strong> 26(2) of the 2005 Act states that:<br />

“a pers<strong>on</strong> does not incur liability for carrying out or c<strong>on</strong>tinuing the<br />

treatment unless, at the time, he is satisfied that an advance decisi<strong>on</strong><br />

exists which is valid and applicable to the treatment.” 119<br />

115 Secti<strong>on</strong> 13(1)(b) of the C<strong>on</strong>trol of Clinical Trials Act 1987.<br />

116 Secti<strong>on</strong> 14 of the C<strong>on</strong>trol of Clinical Trials Act 1987.<br />

117 The <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> for England and Wales Report <strong>on</strong> Mental Incapacity (No<br />

231 1995) at paragraph 5.27.<br />

118 Emphasis added. See also Mental Capacity Act 2005 – Code of Practice at<br />

paragraph 9.59.<br />

119 Emphasis added.<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!