Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
when making an advance care directive. In the case of advance care directives<br />
refusing life-sustaining medical treatment, the Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally<br />
recommends that medical advice must be obtained for the advance care<br />
directive to be valid. [Paragraph 3.15]<br />
6.11 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that there is a rebuttable<br />
presumpti<strong>on</strong> of capacity in favour of the maker of an advance care directive.<br />
[Paragraph 3.34]<br />
6.12 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that the capacity to<br />
refuse healthcare decisi<strong>on</strong>s should be assessed <strong>on</strong> the functi<strong>on</strong>al test of<br />
capacity. The Commissi<strong>on</strong> also provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that the statutory<br />
codes of practice be formulated to guide healthcare professi<strong>on</strong>als when<br />
assessing the capacity of an individual. [Paragraph 3.35]<br />
6.13 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> invites submissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the age a pers<strong>on</strong> must be<br />
before they can make a valid advance care directive. [Paragraph 3.52]<br />
6.14 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that both oral and written<br />
advance care directives are valid. [Paragraph 4.13]<br />
6.15 In the case of life-sustaining treatment, the Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally<br />
recommends that <strong>on</strong>ly written advance care directives are valid. The<br />
Commissi<strong>on</strong> invites submissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the definiti<strong>on</strong> of life-sustaining medical<br />
treatment and <strong>on</strong> whether artificial nutriti<strong>on</strong> and hydrati<strong>on</strong> is life-sustaining<br />
medical treatment. [Paragraph 4.23]<br />
6.16 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that <strong>on</strong>ly a written<br />
advance care directive which refuses life-sustaining medical treatment must be<br />
witnessed by at least <strong>on</strong>e pers<strong>on</strong>. [Paragraph 4.33]<br />
6.17 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that it is not necessary<br />
for an advance care directive to be in a prescribed form. [Paragraph 4.37]<br />
6.18 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that an advance care<br />
directive will not be valid if<br />
The author of the advance care directive did not have<br />
capacity at the time of its creati<strong>on</strong><br />
The creati<strong>on</strong> of the advance care directive was not a<br />
voluntary act of the author<br />
If the author changed their mind and communicated this<br />
change of mind<br />
If a written advance care directive refusing lifesustaining<br />
medical treatment was not witnessed and if<br />
the pers<strong>on</strong> did not c<strong>on</strong>sult with a medical professi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
[Paragraph 4.61]<br />
152