30.01.2013 Views

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sec<strong>on</strong>d generati<strong>on</strong> of statutes emerged, permitting the creati<strong>on</strong> of durable<br />

powers of attorney which were specifically c<strong>on</strong>cerned with health care<br />

decisi<strong>on</strong>s. 45 Subsequently, a third generati<strong>on</strong> of hybrid statutes developed,<br />

which combined provisi<strong>on</strong>s related to living wills with the opti<strong>on</strong> of appointing a<br />

proxy decisi<strong>on</strong>-maker. A fourth generati<strong>on</strong> of advance care directive legislati<strong>on</strong><br />

has recently emerged, which vests power in the patient‟s family members where<br />

the patient has not made an advance directive. 46<br />

2.23 In 1985 the Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act was drafted by<br />

the US Uniform <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>ers in an attempt to make state laws uniform in<br />

purpose and form. However, the success of this legislati<strong>on</strong> appeared to have a<br />

limited effect: in a 1989 report it was noted that <strong>on</strong>ly 9% of Americans had<br />

executed advance directives. 47<br />

(3) Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health<br />

2.24 The Supreme Court decisi<strong>on</strong> in Cruzan v Director, Missouri<br />

Department of Health 48 in 1990 served as a powerful catalyst for legislative<br />

reform. There, the family of Nancy Cruzan, who was in a persistent vegetative<br />

state, sought to withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment based <strong>on</strong> an earlier<br />

c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong> in which Ms Cruzan had stated she did not wish to live if she<br />

would face life as a „vegetable‟. The Supreme Court held that competent<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>s have a “c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>ally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted<br />

medical treatment.” 49 A flurry of legislative activity took place in the United<br />

States as a result of Cruzan. First, existing legislati<strong>on</strong> was amended, as the<br />

Supreme Court had not drawn a distincti<strong>on</strong> between the withdrawal of artificial<br />

nutriti<strong>on</strong> and hydrati<strong>on</strong> and other medical treatment. 50 Sec<strong>on</strong>d, and more<br />

importantly, the Supreme Court held that states could insist <strong>on</strong> “clear and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>vincing evidence” of a patient‟s wishes before permitting hospitals to<br />

withdraw life support. The Court noted that written instructi<strong>on</strong>s - such as those<br />

provided in a living will – are persuasive evidence of an individual‟s “prior<br />

45 The first and best-known example was again in California: the Durable Power of<br />

Attorney Health Care Act 1983.<br />

46 Indiana is an example of a state which has enacted such legislati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

47 Emanuel and Emanuel “The Medical Care Directive: A New Comprehensive Care<br />

Document” (1989) 261 Journal of American Medical Associati<strong>on</strong> 3288 cited by<br />

Brennan J (dissenting) in Cruzan v Missouri Department of Health (1990) 110 S<br />

Ct 2841 at 2875 n.21.<br />

48 (1990) 497 US 261.<br />

49 Ibid at 278.<br />

50 Kennedy and Grubb Medical <strong>Law</strong> (3 rd ed Butterworths 2000) at 2047.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!