Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
Consultation Paper on Bioethics - Law Reform Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
sec<strong>on</strong>d generati<strong>on</strong> of statutes emerged, permitting the creati<strong>on</strong> of durable<br />
powers of attorney which were specifically c<strong>on</strong>cerned with health care<br />
decisi<strong>on</strong>s. 45 Subsequently, a third generati<strong>on</strong> of hybrid statutes developed,<br />
which combined provisi<strong>on</strong>s related to living wills with the opti<strong>on</strong> of appointing a<br />
proxy decisi<strong>on</strong>-maker. A fourth generati<strong>on</strong> of advance care directive legislati<strong>on</strong><br />
has recently emerged, which vests power in the patient‟s family members where<br />
the patient has not made an advance directive. 46<br />
2.23 In 1985 the Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act was drafted by<br />
the US Uniform <strong>Law</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>ers in an attempt to make state laws uniform in<br />
purpose and form. However, the success of this legislati<strong>on</strong> appeared to have a<br />
limited effect: in a 1989 report it was noted that <strong>on</strong>ly 9% of Americans had<br />
executed advance directives. 47<br />
(3) Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health<br />
2.24 The Supreme Court decisi<strong>on</strong> in Cruzan v Director, Missouri<br />
Department of Health 48 in 1990 served as a powerful catalyst for legislative<br />
reform. There, the family of Nancy Cruzan, who was in a persistent vegetative<br />
state, sought to withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment based <strong>on</strong> an earlier<br />
c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong> in which Ms Cruzan had stated she did not wish to live if she<br />
would face life as a „vegetable‟. The Supreme Court held that competent<br />
pers<strong>on</strong>s have a “c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>ally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted<br />
medical treatment.” 49 A flurry of legislative activity took place in the United<br />
States as a result of Cruzan. First, existing legislati<strong>on</strong> was amended, as the<br />
Supreme Court had not drawn a distincti<strong>on</strong> between the withdrawal of artificial<br />
nutriti<strong>on</strong> and hydrati<strong>on</strong> and other medical treatment. 50 Sec<strong>on</strong>d, and more<br />
importantly, the Supreme Court held that states could insist <strong>on</strong> “clear and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>vincing evidence” of a patient‟s wishes before permitting hospitals to<br />
withdraw life support. The Court noted that written instructi<strong>on</strong>s - such as those<br />
provided in a living will – are persuasive evidence of an individual‟s “prior<br />
45 The first and best-known example was again in California: the Durable Power of<br />
Attorney Health Care Act 1983.<br />
46 Indiana is an example of a state which has enacted such legislati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
47 Emanuel and Emanuel “The Medical Care Directive: A New Comprehensive Care<br />
Document” (1989) 261 Journal of American Medical Associati<strong>on</strong> 3288 cited by<br />
Brennan J (dissenting) in Cruzan v Missouri Department of Health (1990) 110 S<br />
Ct 2841 at 2875 n.21.<br />
48 (1990) 497 US 261.<br />
49 Ibid at 278.<br />
50 Kennedy and Grubb Medical <strong>Law</strong> (3 rd ed Butterworths 2000) at 2047.<br />
44