30.01.2013 Views

Download Green Economy Report - UNEP

Download Green Economy Report - UNEP

Download Green Economy Report - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Towards a green economy<br />

528<br />

Thousands of km3 per year<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Municipal<br />

Industry<br />

Agriculture<br />

2010 2050<br />

BAU<br />

Demand reduction<br />

from green investement<br />

Water demand<br />

Conventional surface<br />

and groundwater supply<br />

not from green investment<br />

2050<br />

G2 Demand<br />

2050<br />

G2 Supply<br />

Water saving due to<br />

e�ciency improvements<br />

Desalinisation -from<br />

green investments<br />

Conventional -from<br />

green investment<br />

Figure 25: Water supply by source and water<br />

demand by sector (km 3 ), under BAU baseline and G2<br />

scenarios<br />

supply and improve access to water will support<br />

the preservation of groundwater and surface water,<br />

contributing to about 10 per cent of global water<br />

demand both in the short (2015) and longer term (2050)<br />

(See Figure 25). In accordance with the higher availability<br />

of fresh water resources in the green economy scenarios,<br />

the fraction of population under water stress will<br />

increase to 60 per cent in 2020 and stabilise in the long<br />

term to around 62 per cent in 2050, compared to 67 per<br />

cent in the baseline. Water-sector employment will reach<br />

40-43 million in 2050, which is 24-19 per cent below BAU<br />

owing to the reduction in total water consumption, but<br />

it is still 30-38 per cent higher than the 2010 level. In the<br />

short term, employment will remain about the same,<br />

34 million in 2015 under the green and BAU scenarios.<br />

It is worth noting that investments in the water sector<br />

could have considerable impacts in developing<br />

countries, where interventions to improve sanitation<br />

would considerably increase access to potable water,<br />

and higher expenditure in infrastructure could result in<br />

more efficient use of water and increasing agricultural<br />

yields—contributing to poverty reduction, especially in<br />

rural areas.<br />

In the case of lower precipitation in the decades to<br />

come, water stress is projected to be higher and to have<br />

more serious impacts on, among others, agriculture<br />

production. More specifically, with precipitation being<br />

10 per cent below BAU by 2050, water stress is expected<br />

to affect nearly 70 per cent of the population in 2050.<br />

Under this scenario, green investments will reduce water<br />

stress by about 6 per cent, reaching 64 per cent.<br />

Waste<br />

In the green economy scenario, a total of US$118-US$198<br />

billion per year on average is invested in the waste<br />

sector to increase the waste collection rate and promote<br />

recycling and composting practices. The higher collection<br />

rate of wastes (around 82-83 per cent between 2010 and<br />

2050) as well as the projected economic development<br />

in the green scenarios are projected to increase<br />

the total usable waste volume in BAU and green<br />

scenarios by 2-3 per cent in 2020 and 9-12 per cent in<br />

2050. However, owing to the significant improvement<br />

in waste recovery (e.g. recycling rate is 7 per cent in<br />

green scenarios, 2.2 per cent in BAU and additional BAU<br />

cases in 2050), the annual amount of waste directed to<br />

landfills in the green scenarios will be much lower than<br />

the BAU scenario by 2050. Thanks to the improvements<br />

in upstream waste treatment, its employment will reach<br />

25-26 million jobs in 2050, which is 2-3 million higher<br />

than under BAU (the employment gain in 2020 is 0.4-<br />

0.54 million). It is worth mentioning the contribution<br />

of recycling to reducing energy demand and emissions<br />

as well as production costs—positively affecting<br />

industrial GDP.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!