tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...
tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...
tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
78<br />
histories. The Mid-Jurassic zircon grain age group may originate from the like aged<br />
closure of the Rushan Pshart/Bangong-Nujiang suture and associated, arc-related<br />
magmatites of the Rushan Pshart arc along the southern margin of the Qiangtang<br />
block. The Early Cretaceous zircon grains may have been influenced by a reheating<br />
event in the South Pamirs and Karakoram. During the Cretaceous, the Hindu Kush-<br />
Karakoram-South Pamirs were the active margin arc of the northward subducting<br />
Shyok suture. The subduction/accretion processes led to widespread metamorphism<br />
and most likely bimodal magmatism in the Cretaceous times (~120 Ma and ~80 Ma).<br />
Only few fission track data were published from northern Tibet. Jolivet et al. (2001)<br />
provided zircon fission track ages from basement rocks of the Kunlun mountains,<br />
ranging from Late Triassic (220-200 Ma) to Middle and Late Jurassic (172-143 Ma), to<br />
Late Cretaceous (~96 Ma). Apatite fission track data from the same samples were<br />
separated into two groups >50 Ma and 50 Ma into subgroups of Middle to Late Jurassic (167 to<br />
147 Ma), Early Cretaceous (138 to 97 Ma) and Early to Middle Eocene (55-48 Ma). The<br />
Late Triassic zircon fission track ages of the basement rocks post-date the<br />
Permian/Triassic peak detected by the Tertiary sediment samples from the<br />
northernmost Pamirs, but matches very well with the post-tectonic emplacement ages<br />
of the Karakul and Sailiak batholiths. However, the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous<br />
peak ages from the Altyndara valley correspond well to the zircon and apatite age<br />
groups from basement rocks of Jolivets et al. (2001) study. These authors interpret all<br />
zircon ages to represent a Jurassic cooling event, with the Middle to Late Jurassic<br />
cooling ages exhumed from deeper crustal levels due to their hanging wall structural<br />
positions. From apatite fission track ages Jolivet et al. (2001) suggest slow long term<br />
erosion in Jurassic time with low cooling rates of 0.1°C/Ma to 1.3°C/Ma. The<br />
Cretaceous in north Tibet is characterised by sedimentation and in some places by a<br />
reheating of rocks to 60°C to 70°C, probably around 120±20 Ma (Jolivet et al. (2001).<br />
The authors conclude that there was either a previously formed relief initiated in the<br />
Jurassic and which experienced differential subsidence in the Cretaceous and/or weak<br />
tectonic activity in the Cretaceous after the collision of the Qiangtang and Lhasa<br />
blocks.<br />
Karakul-Mazar granitoid belt, Northern Pamirs<br />
Five different granitoid locations were probed across the Triassic/Jurassic Karakul-<br />
Mazar batholith belt. Two zircon fission track samples yielded late Early Cretaceous<br />
cooling around 122-108 Ma, which can be interpreted as a thermal event related to<br />
Cretaceous arc magmatism in the south (e.g. Shyok arc), or as slow denudational<br />
cooling following the emplacement of the Triassic/Jurassic granitoids. Apparent<br />
apatite fission track ages range from Eocene to Miocene (56-18 Ma) and young from<br />
south to north, whereas the cooling rates increase towards the north (Fig. 4.2 and 4.3).<br />
Detailed structural mapping is missing in the Karakul-Mazar belt and therefore the<br />
apatite fission track age distribution is difficult to interpret. As discussed in Schwab et<br />
al. (in press), the massive batholith in the Karakul-Mazar belt may have acted like a<br />
rigid backbone during the Tertiary and deformation may be confined to the margins of<br />
the batholith belt. The right-lateral transpressional Markansu fault to the north of the