30.01.2013 Views

tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...

tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...

tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

amphibole, white mica, and biotite as well as K/Ar dating of sericite (Appendix A, Tab.<br />

A3, A4, A5). These dating methods were determined on samples from the Muzkol and<br />

Sares domes (Fig. 4.1):<br />

(1) Rb/Sr whole rock-muscovite ages of basement rocks, e.g. biotite schists and<br />

gneisses, were determined on two samples from the southern side of the Sares<br />

dome. Sample 96A5i yielded 37.1±0.4 Ma and sample A96A5k 30.0±1.2 Ma. The<br />

sample 96Ak3d from the northern side of the Muzkol dome obtained an age of<br />

68.0±7.7 Ma. As the error is very high, the date will not be included into the<br />

discussion or conclusion.<br />

(2) Several intrusions and dykes of likely Tertiary age were probed in the Muzkol and<br />

Sares domes. Sample P17, an undeformed aplite dyke that cuts high-grade biotite<br />

gneiss in the Muzkol dome is already described in chap. 3: the sample contains<br />

inherited zircons with spot ages in the range of 561 to 424 Ma, which are attributed<br />

to characterise the Qiangtang basement. Conventional U/Pb zircon dating points to<br />

an upper intercept age of 539±5 Ma with assumed Pb-loss at 44±22 Ma. Such a<br />

crystallisation/Recent Pb-loss model infers Tertiary disturbance of the U/Pb<br />

system, even so no Tertiary rims could be detected with SHRIMP analyses.<br />

Nevertheless, it was suggested that the dike was emplaced in the Tertiary<br />

(Schwab et al. in press). Another Tertiary intrusion (P15) into the Muzkol dome and<br />

a dyke of the Sares dome (96A6b) yielded conventional U/Pb zircon upper intercept<br />

ages of 540±4 Ma and 570±230 Ma, respectively. The lower intercept age is<br />

around 31±2 Ma in case of sample P15, and around 17±8 Ma for sample 96A6b.<br />

The U/Pb data are included in Appendix A, Tab. A7.<br />

(3) Rb/Sr whole rock-muscovite dating of sample L96A11a, a pegmatitic dyke crosscutting<br />

basement units of the Sares dome, gave an age of 13.7±0.1 Ma (see<br />

Appendix A, Tab. A5).<br />

(4) Ar/Ar amphibole, muscovite, and biotite ages of the Muzkol and Sares domes were<br />

obtained from basalts, basement, and intrusive rocks. The data are summarised in<br />

Appendix A, Tab. A3. The metamorphic mineral ages are in the range of 28 to 14<br />

Ma. Tertiary basalts crosscut the Muzkol and Sares domes and extruded in an<br />

extensional setting as indicated by structural analyses and preliminary<br />

geochemical classifications (see Appendix A, Tab. A2). The basalts yield Ar/Ar<br />

whole rock ages of about 20 Ma.<br />

(5) Sandstones from Tertiary sediments from the Murgab profile (Fig. 4.4) show anchi-<br />

to greenschist facies overprint. Five samples of metamorphic grown sericite were<br />

dated by the K/Ar method (see Appendix A, Tab. A4). The ages range from 14 Ma<br />

in the north of the section to 33 Ma further to the south.<br />

4.3 Discussion<br />

South Tien Shan<br />

Fission track ages of Tertiary sediments from the southernmost Tien Shan confirm<br />

the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic history of the Tien Shan as suggested in chapter 3: the<br />

basement of the Tien Shan is composed of different terranes which were originally<br />

sutured together during two collisions in Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous and Late<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!