tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...
tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...
tübinger geowissenschaftliche arbeiten (tga) - TOBIAS-lib ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LIV<br />
Tab. C7 Apatite and zircon fission track data and calculated age clusters<br />
Fit statistics<br />
P(F)<br />
0%<br />
� 2<br />
106.3<br />
3<br />
best-fit peak-ages (Ma)<br />
2<br />
1<br />
P(� 2 )<br />
(%)<br />
Dosimeter<br />
Induced<br />
Spontaneous<br />
Nd<br />
245±39<br />
Nf=28.7<br />
Frac.%=27.1<br />
144±14<br />
Nf=56.2<br />
Frac.%=53.0<br />
75.6±6.5<br />
Nf=21.1<br />
Frac.%=19.9<br />
0.0<br />
9253<br />
� d<br />
4.66<br />
Ni<br />
2334<br />
� i<br />
12.15<br />
Ns<br />
no. of<br />
crystals<br />
3617<br />
� s<br />
18.829<br />
106<br />
sedimentation<br />
age (Ma)<br />
?Neogene<br />
Sample<br />
TS5a apatite<br />
0%<br />
8.15<br />
333±56<br />
Nf=1.5 Frac.%=13.4<br />
170±16<br />
Nf=9.5 Frac.%=86.6<br />
87.43<br />
14919<br />
4.66<br />
202<br />
8.197<br />
375<br />
15.218<br />
10<br />
?Upper<br />
Paleogene<br />
TS8a apatite<br />
0%<br />
61.15<br />
266±22<br />
Nf=40.2 Frac.%=66.0<br />
145±15<br />
Nf=20.8 Frac.%=34.0<br />
0.0<br />
10665<br />
5.4<br />
829<br />
35.026<br />
5237<br />
221.267<br />
61<br />
?Neogene<br />
TS5a zircon<br />
0%<br />
41.49<br />
243±20<br />
Nf=22.5 Frac.%=52.2<br />
131±10<br />
Nf=20.5 Frac.%=47.8<br />
0.0<br />
10665<br />
5.4<br />
784<br />
37.79<br />
4290<br />
206.785<br />
43<br />
no data<br />
AD7d zircon<br />
0%<br />
59.08<br />
371±50<br />
Nf=16.9 242±33<br />
Nf=28.9 165±19<br />
Nf=13.1 0.0<br />
10665<br />
5.4<br />
1207<br />
44.416<br />
9070<br />
333.768<br />
59<br />
?Neogene<br />
A96K1e zircon<br />
Frac.%=28.7<br />
Frac.%=49.0<br />
Frac.%=22.3<br />
The modelled peak-ages are calculated with the BINOMFIT program (Brandon 2002), based on the binomial “peak-fitting” method of Galbraith & Green (1990). The uncertainty of the<br />
peak-ages is given at 68% confidence level (1�). The size of the individual peaks is reported as a fraction in percent (Frac.%) and as number of grains in the peak-age population (Nf).<br />
� 2 =Chi-squared value for best fit, P(F) is the improvement if the fit in peaks is significant. P(F) < ~5% indicate that the improvement in fit is very good. ��=track density, N=number of<br />
counted tracks, �Nf=total number of grains.