04.02.2013 Views

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1104 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 40:1103<br />

term “RVCF” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer only to an <strong>Indiana</strong><br />

Regional Venture Capital Fund. Whenever the term “EDA” is used <strong>in</strong> this<br />

Article, such term shall refer only to an <strong>Indiana</strong> Economic Development Area.<br />

Whenever the term “CEDIT” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer only to<br />

the <strong>Indiana</strong> County Economic Development Income Taxes. Whenever the term<br />

“EDIT” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer only to the <strong>Indiana</strong> Economic<br />

Development Income Tax. Whenever the term “EDGE” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article,<br />

such term shall refer only to the <strong>Indiana</strong> Economic Development for a Grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Economy. Whenever the term “NIRDA” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall<br />

refer only to the Northwest <strong>Indiana</strong> Regional Development Authority. Whenever<br />

the term “PTRF” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer only to the <strong>Indiana</strong><br />

Property Tax Reassessment Fund. Whenever the term “CIB” is used <strong>in</strong> this<br />

Article, such term shall refer only to the <strong>Indiana</strong> Capital Improvement Board.”<br />

Whenever the term “MOD” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer only to<br />

a maritime opportunity district. Whenever the term “MDC” is used <strong>in</strong> this<br />

Article, such term shall refer only to a <strong>Indiana</strong> Metropolitan Development<br />

Commission.” Whenever the term “QIP” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall<br />

refer only to <strong>Indiana</strong> Qualify<strong>in</strong>g Industrial Property. Whenever the term<br />

“MBRAB” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer only to the <strong>Indiana</strong><br />

Military Base Reuse Authority Board. Whenever the term “BMV” is used <strong>in</strong> this<br />

Article, such term shall refer only to the <strong>Indiana</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Motor Vehicles.<br />

Whenever the term “IRC” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer only to the<br />

Internal Revenue Code which is <strong>in</strong> effect at the time <strong>of</strong> the publication <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Article. Whenever the term “AOPA” is used <strong>in</strong> this Article, such term shall refer<br />

only to the <strong>Indiana</strong> Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Orders and Procedures Act.<br />

I. INDIANA GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATION<br />

The 114th GA passed several pieces <strong>of</strong> legislation affect<strong>in</strong>g various areas <strong>of</strong><br />

state and local taxation, i.e., property taxes, local taxes, <strong>in</strong>heritance tax, and sales<br />

and use taxes. There are also several other changes noted <strong>in</strong> the miscellaneous<br />

section. The most significant changes were <strong>in</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> property taxes.<br />

Almost all cases which <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>Indiana</strong> taxation are <strong>in</strong>itially heard by the Tax<br />

Court. However, with respect to some cases, the Tax Court hears the case de<br />

novo, <strong>in</strong> which case the Tax Court hears the facts, and based on those facts,<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>es which law should be applied to such facts and what the result should<br />

be after mak<strong>in</strong>g such application. With respect to other cases, the Tax Court sits<br />

as an appellate court and determ<strong>in</strong>es whether or not the prior trier <strong>of</strong> facts<br />

decision was supported by substantial evidence and whether or not the prior trier<br />

<strong>of</strong> facts properly applied the applicable law to such facts. In this latter case, the<br />

Tax Court must determ<strong>in</strong>e whether or not the decision <strong>of</strong> the prior trier <strong>of</strong> fact<br />

was supported by substantial evidence and whether or not such prior trier <strong>of</strong><br />

fact’s decision was arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse <strong>of</strong> the prior trier <strong>of</strong> fact’s<br />

discretion. In general, the cases which are heard de novo by the Tax Court are<br />

those which orig<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> the DOR and the cases with respect to which the Tax<br />

Court sits as an appellate court are those which have been previously tried before<br />

the BTR. To emphasize this dist<strong>in</strong>ction, the DLGF <strong>in</strong>serts the follow<strong>in</strong>g warn<strong>in</strong>g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!