04.02.2013 Views

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1138 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 40:1103<br />

reduction may not exceed the lesser <strong>of</strong> 2% <strong>of</strong> the assessable property <strong>in</strong> the<br />

tax<strong>in</strong>g unit or the amount <strong>of</strong> any reduction <strong>in</strong> the previous year that resulted from<br />

356<br />

successful appeals. A county auditor may request approval from the DLGF for<br />

a larger reduction amount. 357<br />

The DLGF need no longer <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>structions on how to calculate<br />

depreciation <strong>of</strong> real property or replacement cost <strong>of</strong> improvements <strong>in</strong> its rules. 358<br />

In addition, the BTR need no longer provide notice <strong>of</strong> its f<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ations<br />

359<br />

directly to the affected tax<strong>in</strong>g units. Instead, the county auditor must notify the<br />

tax<strong>in</strong>g units. In addition, the DLGF is no longer required to <strong>in</strong>clude cost and<br />

depreciation tables <strong>in</strong> the real property rule promulgated for a general<br />

reassessment. 360<br />

If the BTR fails to hold a hear<strong>in</strong>g on a petition with<strong>in</strong> the maximum allowed<br />

361<br />

time, that failure does not constitute a f<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ation. If the BTR does not<br />

hold a hear<strong>in</strong>g or fails to issue a f<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the petitioner may wait for<br />

362<br />

the board to act or may request judicial review. If the petitioner <strong>in</strong>itiates a<br />

judicial proceed<strong>in</strong>g and the BTR has not issued a determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the Tax Court<br />

will hear the matter de novo. 363<br />

Local <strong>of</strong>ficials who are defendants <strong>in</strong> actions concern<strong>in</strong>g orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ations that they made may, with written approval from the <strong>Indiana</strong><br />

Attorney General, hire a private attorney (at local expense) to represent them<br />

before the Tax Court. 364<br />

H. Tax Collection<br />

A county sheriff may no longer release a judgment aris<strong>in</strong>g from a tax warrant<br />

once the judgment is paid <strong>in</strong> full. Only the DOR may release such judgments. 365<br />

41 (West)).<br />

356. Id.<br />

357. Id. § 6-1.1-17-8.5 (as added by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 154-2006 (S.E.A. 260) § 43<br />

(West)).<br />

358. Id. § 6-1.1-31-6 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 154-2006 (S.E.A. 260) § 52<br />

(West)).<br />

359. Id. § 6-1.1-15-4 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 154-2006 (S.E.A. 260) § 39<br />

(West)); id. § 6-1.5-5-2 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 154-2006 (S.E.A. 260) § 62<br />

(West)).<br />

360. Id. § 6-1.1-15-4; id. § 6-1.5-5-5 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 154-2006<br />

(S.E.A. 260) § 63 (West)).<br />

361. Id. § 6-1.5-5-6 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 154-2006 (S.E.A. 260) § 64<br />

(West)).<br />

362. Id.<br />

363. Id.<br />

364. Id. § 33-26-7-1 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 154-2006 (S.E.A. 260) § 70<br />

(West)).<br />

365. Id. § 6-8.1-8-2(g) & (l) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A.<br />

362) § 6 (West)).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!