04.02.2013 Views

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1134 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 40:1103<br />

<strong>Indiana</strong> retail merchants will now have to renew their merchant’s certificate<br />

313<br />

every two years <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> hold<strong>in</strong>g a perpetual certificate. The DOR must<br />

renew certificates with<strong>in</strong> 30 days after expiration at no charge if the retail<br />

merchant has filed all <strong>Indiana</strong> Sales and Use Tax returns and paid all taxes. 314<br />

However, the DOR may not renew the certificate <strong>of</strong> a merchant who has failed<br />

315<br />

to remit Sales and Use Taxes. The statute provides that the DOR must notify<br />

a del<strong>in</strong>quent retail merchant that it will not renew the merchant’s certificate at<br />

316<br />

least 60 days prior to the certificate’s expiration date. Certificates orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

317<br />

issued before December 1, 2006, expired on December 31, 2006. Certificates<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>ally issued after November 30, 2006, and before January 1, 2007, will<br />

318<br />

expire on December 31, 2008. However, the DOR may delay the expiration<br />

date for exist<strong>in</strong>g certificates for up to one year to cope more effectively with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased workload. 319<br />

The GA added a deduction from <strong>Indiana</strong> sales tax for the retail sale <strong>of</strong> E85<br />

fuel. The deduction is equivalent to $0.10 per gallon <strong>of</strong> E85 sold dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

320<br />

report<strong>in</strong>g periods from July 1, 2006, and July 1, 2008. The maximum<br />

aggregate deduction for all merchants claim<strong>in</strong>g the deduction for sales <strong>of</strong> E85 is<br />

321<br />

$2 million. If the DOR determ<strong>in</strong>es that the amount <strong>of</strong> deductions allowed will<br />

exceed the cap, the DOR is required to publish <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Indiana</strong> Register a notice<br />

that the deduction is term<strong>in</strong>ated after the date specified <strong>in</strong> the notice and that no<br />

additional deductions will be granted for transactions occurr<strong>in</strong>g after the date <strong>in</strong><br />

the notice. 322<br />

For transactions occurr<strong>in</strong>g after January 1, 2007, an entity may not assign its<br />

323<br />

sales tax remittance deduction to a non-affiliated entity. The statute generally<br />

§ 1 (West)).<br />

313. Id. § 6-2.5-8-1(f) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) §<br />

1 (West)); see also id. § 6-2.5-8-5 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A.<br />

362) § 1 (West)).<br />

314. Id. § 6-2.5-8-1(f) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) §<br />

1 (West)).<br />

315. Id. § 6-2.5-8-1(g) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) §<br />

1 (West)).<br />

316. Id.<br />

317. 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) § 12 (West).<br />

318. Id.<br />

319. Id.<br />

320. IND. CODE § 6-2.5-7-5(5)(c) (2006) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 122-2006<br />

(S.E.A. 353) § 3 (West)).<br />

321. Id. § 6-2.5-7-5(5)(d) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 122-2006 (S.E.A. 353)<br />

§ 3 (West)).<br />

322. Id.<br />

323. Id. § 6-2.5-6-9(c) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 162-2006 (H.E.A. 1001)<br />

§ 23 (West) and 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 184-2006 (H.E.A. 1327) § 2 (West)).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!