Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1134 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 40:1103<br />
<strong>Indiana</strong> retail merchants will now have to renew their merchant’s certificate<br />
313<br />
every two years <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> hold<strong>in</strong>g a perpetual certificate. The DOR must<br />
renew certificates with<strong>in</strong> 30 days after expiration at no charge if the retail<br />
merchant has filed all <strong>Indiana</strong> Sales and Use Tax returns and paid all taxes. 314<br />
However, the DOR may not renew the certificate <strong>of</strong> a merchant who has failed<br />
315<br />
to remit Sales and Use Taxes. The statute provides that the DOR must notify<br />
a del<strong>in</strong>quent retail merchant that it will not renew the merchant’s certificate at<br />
316<br />
least 60 days prior to the certificate’s expiration date. Certificates orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />
317<br />
issued before December 1, 2006, expired on December 31, 2006. Certificates<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>ally issued after November 30, 2006, and before January 1, 2007, will<br />
318<br />
expire on December 31, 2008. However, the DOR may delay the expiration<br />
date for exist<strong>in</strong>g certificates for up to one year to cope more effectively with the<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased workload. 319<br />
The GA added a deduction from <strong>Indiana</strong> sales tax for the retail sale <strong>of</strong> E85<br />
fuel. The deduction is equivalent to $0.10 per gallon <strong>of</strong> E85 sold dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
320<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g periods from July 1, 2006, and July 1, 2008. The maximum<br />
aggregate deduction for all merchants claim<strong>in</strong>g the deduction for sales <strong>of</strong> E85 is<br />
321<br />
$2 million. If the DOR determ<strong>in</strong>es that the amount <strong>of</strong> deductions allowed will<br />
exceed the cap, the DOR is required to publish <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Indiana</strong> Register a notice<br />
that the deduction is term<strong>in</strong>ated after the date specified <strong>in</strong> the notice and that no<br />
additional deductions will be granted for transactions occurr<strong>in</strong>g after the date <strong>in</strong><br />
the notice. 322<br />
For transactions occurr<strong>in</strong>g after January 1, 2007, an entity may not assign its<br />
323<br />
sales tax remittance deduction to a non-affiliated entity. The statute generally<br />
§ 1 (West)).<br />
313. Id. § 6-2.5-8-1(f) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) §<br />
1 (West)); see also id. § 6-2.5-8-5 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A.<br />
362) § 1 (West)).<br />
314. Id. § 6-2.5-8-1(f) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) §<br />
1 (West)).<br />
315. Id. § 6-2.5-8-1(g) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) §<br />
1 (West)).<br />
316. Id.<br />
317. 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 111-2006 (S.E.A. 362) § 12 (West).<br />
318. Id.<br />
319. Id.<br />
320. IND. CODE § 6-2.5-7-5(5)(c) (2006) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 122-2006<br />
(S.E.A. 353) § 3 (West)).<br />
321. Id. § 6-2.5-7-5(5)(d) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 122-2006 (S.E.A. 353)<br />
§ 3 (West)).<br />
322. Id.<br />
323. Id. § 6-2.5-6-9(c) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 162-2006 (H.E.A. 1001)<br />
§ 23 (West) and 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 184-2006 (H.E.A. 1327) § 2 (West)).