Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2007] TAX LAW 1129<br />
by reorganiz<strong>in</strong>g and cooperat<strong>in</strong>g. 262<br />
The GA added I.C. §§ 36-1.5-1-2, -3, -4, and -5 (effective March 24, 2006)<br />
which state that the complete authority for reorganization, cooperation, and<br />
263<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> duties between units is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> I.C. § 36-1.5. This addition<br />
also provides that no law, procedure, proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, publications, notices,<br />
consents, approvals, or acts outside <strong>of</strong> I.C. § 36-1.5 are required for<br />
reorganization, cooperation, or transfer. 264<br />
The GA added I.C. § 36-1.5-1-7 (effective March 24, 2006) which states that<br />
I.C. § 36-1.5 does not prohibit reorganization, cooperation, or transfer <strong>of</strong> duties<br />
under any other statute. 265<br />
The GA added I.C. § 36-1.5-3 (effective March 24, 2006) which requires<br />
266<br />
submission <strong>of</strong> any ord<strong>in</strong>ance for resolution to DLGF. This change also<br />
requires DLGF to adjust the maximum permissible levies, rates, and budgets <strong>of</strong><br />
267<br />
reorganiz<strong>in</strong>g subdivisions. The GA allowed judicial review <strong>of</strong> DLGF<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ations under this chapter. 268<br />
The GA added I.C. § 36-1.5-4 (effective March 24, 2006) which provides<br />
procedure for reorganization by referendum. 269<br />
The GA added I.C. § 36-1.5-5 (effective March 24, 2006) which provides<br />
procedure for cooperative agreements and transfer <strong>of</strong> responsibilities. 270<br />
C. Local <strong>Taxation</strong><br />
The GA passed legislation that allowed certa<strong>in</strong> counties to use funds from<br />
CAGIT to operate and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> jail facilities; juvenile court, detention, and<br />
probation facilities; other crim<strong>in</strong>al justice facilities; and related build<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />
271<br />
park<strong>in</strong>g facilities. The only counties that meet the criteria are Elkhart and<br />
Marshall. The same legislation prevents Marshall County from us<strong>in</strong>g the CAGIT<br />
to pay for jail ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and operations once the bonds issued to pay jail<br />
construction are paid <strong>of</strong>f. 272<br />
The GA extended Jackson County’s authorization to impose an additional<br />
CAGIT to generate revenue for a jail and juvenile detention center until June 30,<br />
273<br />
2011. Scott County may impose an additional COIT <strong>of</strong> up to 0.25% to f<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
262. Id. § 4.<br />
263. Id.<br />
264. Id.<br />
265. Id.<br />
266. Id.<br />
267. Id.<br />
268. Id.<br />
269. Id.<br />
270. Id.<br />
271. IND. CODE § 6-3.5-1.1-2.8 (2006) (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 147-2006<br />
(S.E.A. 148) § 1 (West)).<br />
272. Id.<br />
273. Id. § 6-3.5-1.1-2.5 (as amended by 2006 Ind. Legis. Serv. P.L. 184-2006 (H.E.A. 1327)