Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2007] TAX LAW 1157<br />
presumption that the assessment is correct is to provide a pr<strong>of</strong>essional appraisal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the property, use <strong>in</strong>formation such as “actual construction costs, sales<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the subject or comparable properties,” or other <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
as long as the additional <strong>in</strong>formation was available to the assessor at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
577<br />
the assessment. The Eckerl<strong>in</strong>gs did not provide any <strong>of</strong> this evidence, focus<strong>in</strong>g<br />
578<br />
<strong>in</strong>stead on the alleged failure <strong>of</strong> the assessor to follow the guidel<strong>in</strong>es. This is<br />
not sufficient to rebut the presumption that the assessment was correct so the<br />
f<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the BTR was affirmed. 579<br />
580<br />
3. PIA Builders & Developers, LLC v. Jenn<strong>in</strong>gs County Assessor. —In this<br />
consolidated op<strong>in</strong>ion, the Tax Court denied three substantially identical petitions<br />
581<br />
for rehear<strong>in</strong>g by separate taxpayers. The taxpayers argued that: 1) assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials can only use the cost approach for assess<strong>in</strong>g property; 2) the assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>in</strong> the cases at bar ignored that law and adjusted the assessments to more<br />
accurately reflect the properties’ market values-<strong>in</strong>-use; and 3) the Tax Court<br />
582<br />
“endorsed the misapplication <strong>of</strong> the law” <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the rul<strong>in</strong>gs that it did. The<br />
Tax Court reiterated what it “expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> great length” <strong>in</strong> the cases below: that<br />
the goal <strong>of</strong> the new assessment system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indiana</strong> is to accurately reflect a<br />
583<br />
property’s market value-<strong>in</strong>-use. The assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es provide a variety<br />
584<br />
<strong>of</strong> assessment approaches, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the cost approach. Further, the guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />
state that the cost approach is merely a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a property’s<br />
585<br />
market value-<strong>in</strong>-use. The old system <strong>of</strong> assessment considered an assessment<br />
to be accurate if the regulations were correctly applied while the new system<br />
focuses more on ensur<strong>in</strong>g that the assessed value is actually correct than on strict<br />
586<br />
application <strong>of</strong> regulations. The Tax Court denied the petitions say<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
under the new system, a taxpayer cannot argue form over substance but must<br />
show that the assessed value is not an accurate reflection <strong>of</strong> the property’s market<br />
value-<strong>in</strong>-use. 587<br />
588<br />
4. BP Products North America, Inc. v. Matonovich. —BP Products North<br />
America, Inc. (BP) owned land and improvements <strong>in</strong> Lake County, <strong>Indiana</strong>, and<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiated this action on April 4, 2003, to appeal the BTA’s denial <strong>of</strong> its June,<br />
589<br />
2000, petitions for review <strong>of</strong> assessments made <strong>in</strong> 1999. In June 2000, BP<br />
made 79 separate claims <strong>of</strong> review <strong>of</strong> assessments to the SBTC, claim<strong>in</strong>g that its<br />
577. Id.<br />
578. Id.<br />
579. Id.<br />
580. 842 N.E.2d 899 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2006).<br />
581. Id. at 899-900.<br />
582. Id. at 900.<br />
583. Id.<br />
584. Id.<br />
585. Id.<br />
586. Id.<br />
587. Id. at 900-01.<br />
588. 842 N.E.2d 901 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2006).<br />
589. Id. at 902-03.