04.02.2013 Views

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

Recent Developments in Indiana Taxation - I.U. School of Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1172 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 40:1103<br />

settlement agreements that would otherwise alter the imposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />

tax. 799<br />

C. Riverboat Wager<strong>in</strong>g Tax: RDI/Caesars Riverboat Cas<strong>in</strong>o, LLC<br />

v. <strong>Indiana</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> State Revenue 800<br />

On September 3, 2004, Caesars appealed the calculation <strong>of</strong> its Riverboat<br />

801<br />

Wager<strong>in</strong>g Tax (RWT) for July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003. The op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

802<br />

was on Caesar’s motion for summary judgment, filed on January 27, 2000. In<br />

2002, the GA legalized flexible schedul<strong>in</strong>g for riverboat cas<strong>in</strong>os beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g July<br />

803 l, 2002. The same legislation implemented a graduated tax rate on the adjusted<br />

gross receipts <strong>of</strong> those riverboats that chose to implement flexible schedul<strong>in</strong>g. 804<br />

Riverboats that did not implement flexible schedul<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued to pay a flat rate<br />

805<br />

<strong>of</strong> tax on their adjusted gross receipts. The 2002 legislation orig<strong>in</strong>ally applied<br />

the graduated tax rates to adjusted gross receipts beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with the date that the<br />

806<br />

cas<strong>in</strong>o implemented flexible schedul<strong>in</strong>g. Caesars implemented flexible<br />

807<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g on August 1, 2002. Based on the 2002 statute, Caesars calculated<br />

808<br />

its RWT for July 2002 at the flat tax rate. Then, it began calculat<strong>in</strong>g the tax<br />

for the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g eleven months accord<strong>in</strong>g to the new graduated tax rates based<br />

809<br />

solely on the adjusted gross receipts earned dur<strong>in</strong>g those eleven months. In<br />

2003, the GA retroactively amended the statute to more clearly state how taxes<br />

should be calculated when a riverboat implemented flexible schedul<strong>in</strong>g for only<br />

810<br />

part <strong>of</strong> a year. The DOR recalculated Caesars’s tax liability us<strong>in</strong>g the amended<br />

811<br />

statute and issued a proposed assessment to Caesars. Caesars argued that the<br />

amendment imposed the graduated tax rates on a riverboat for an entire year,<br />

even when a riverboat had implemented flexible schedul<strong>in</strong>g for only part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

812 year. However, the Tax Court referred to the pla<strong>in</strong> language <strong>of</strong> the statute and<br />

to a companion non-code provision to expla<strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> the amended<br />

813 statute. When a riverboat began or ended flexible schedul<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the middle <strong>of</strong><br />

a tax year, the appropriate graduated tax rate tier would be calculated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

799. Id.<br />

800. 854 N.E.2d 957 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2006), trans. denied (Ind. Feb. 22, 2007).<br />

801. Id. at 958-59.<br />

802. Id.<br />

803. Id. at 958.<br />

804. Id. at 959-60.<br />

805. Id. at 959.<br />

806. Id. at 960 (quot<strong>in</strong>g IND. CODE § 4-33-13-1.5 (2005)).<br />

807. Id. at 958.<br />

808. Id. at 960.<br />

809. Id.<br />

810. Id. at 960-61.<br />

811. Id. at 958, 962.<br />

812. Id. at 962.<br />

813. Id. at 963-65.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!