07.02.2013 Views

Beneficiary Participation in Irrigation Water Management: The Kerala

Beneficiary Participation in Irrigation Water Management: The Kerala

Beneficiary Participation in Irrigation Water Management: The Kerala

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the office-bearers and more than one-third of the ord<strong>in</strong>ary members. Corrupt practices<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased as one moved from the upper reaches of the canal to its tail end areas. Tail-enders<br />

are the worst sufferers <strong>in</strong> irrigation systems.<br />

One of the multiple objectives of BFA is to provide an opportunity for mass action aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

malpractices. If BFA is active and alert, it would resort to such group activity. <strong>The</strong> extent<br />

to which this objective is realised was exam<strong>in</strong>ed. <strong>The</strong> responses are presented <strong>in</strong> the Table<br />

4.12.<br />

Table 4.12 Frequency Distribution by Details of Mass Petition aga<strong>in</strong>st Malpractices<br />

Qn.<br />

No.<br />

14<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

Statements O.Bs O.Ms Reaches-wise Total<br />

U.R M.R L.R<br />

F % F % F % F % F %<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was<br />

mass petition<br />

10 20.8 14 9.8 15 3.7 5 1.2 20 4.9<br />

No mass petition<br />

No effective<br />

action taken<br />

Noth<strong>in</strong>g done<br />

by BFA<br />

Source: Field Survey<br />

Note: O.Bs - Office Bearers of BFAs, O.Ms - Ord<strong>in</strong>ary Members of BFA, Qn. No - Question Number<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Shedule<br />

U.R - Upper Reaches, M.R - Middle Reaches, L.R - Lower Reaches<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to 36 OBs, (represent<strong>in</strong>g 75 percent) and 339 OMs (form<strong>in</strong>g 83 percent) there<br />

were no <strong>in</strong>stances of BFAs submitt<strong>in</strong>g petitions aga<strong>in</strong>st malpractices. N<strong>in</strong>e OBs (out of 10)<br />

admitted that no effective action had ever been taken on such malpractices and that BFAs, <strong>in</strong><br />

general, had taken no <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> organis<strong>in</strong>g such group actions aga<strong>in</strong>st malpractices nor<br />

had they sought solutions to malpractices and corruption. Thus, it is clear that BFAs, organised<br />

for collective action aga<strong>in</strong>st malpractices and resolution of conflicts, failed miserably <strong>in</strong><br />

discharg<strong>in</strong>g their duties.<br />

Recurr<strong>in</strong>g functions<br />

36 75.0 339 82.9 112 73.7 121 89.0 106 87.6<br />

9 18.8 62 15.2 39 25.7 9 66 14 11.6<br />

5 10.4 23 5.6 15 9.9 0 0.0 8 6.6<br />

Recurr<strong>in</strong>g functions are conferred on BFAs with different objectives <strong>in</strong> view. A few functions<br />

are designed to achieve efficient, effective, and equitable distribution of irrigation water and<br />

proper upkeep of the irrigation system, especially the canal network of the project 40 ; another<br />

set of functions related to promot<strong>in</strong>g group activity <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g and collective ownership of<br />

agricultural assets 41 ; a third set aims at the creation of awareness regard<strong>in</strong>g good irrigation<br />

practices and scientific agriculture 42 ; a fourth set has the objective of formulation and<br />

implementation of a proper <strong>in</strong>centive structure 43 ; the last set of functions perta<strong>in</strong> to proper<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration 44 .<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!