09.01.2015 Views

Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia

Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia

Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

404 BRIAN JOHNSTONE<br />

Similarly it is not sufficient to consider only the significance of<br />

the choice and act for the “perfection” of the one acting, we need<br />

also to consider the impact of such acts on the “perfection” of<br />

the person, the receiver, who is to receive them. Insofar as he<br />

intends and acts in such a way as to enable the other to become<br />

a better receiver and giver of gifts, the agent “perfects” himself<br />

as a person, that is, as a giver and receiver of gifts.<br />

The horizon within which we think and act may be designated<br />

as givenness. But this is not to be considered as an<br />

abstraction, as an horizon of mere thought. Givenness articulates<br />

the meaning of the concrete giving of being by God in creation<br />

and grace. Being is given being. All creatures have received<br />

their being and with that the capacity to give to others. All<br />

engage in a complex pattern of relationships of receiving and<br />

giving.<br />

The relationships between persons, that is between intelligent,<br />

free givers and receivers, is inadequately expressed in<br />

terms of “acts.” The concept of act expresses a movement of the<br />

subject-agent, it does not adequately account for the other who<br />

is affected by or receives the movement. In place of the analysis<br />

of “acts” we take up the analysis of gift and consider the receiving<br />

and giving of gifts. Thus, we move beyond a consideration of<br />

the person as “agent” to an appreciation of the person as the<br />

giver of gifts and as receiver of gifts. This in turn requires us to<br />

take into account the capacities and dispositions of those persons<br />

which enable and move them to give and receive, that is the<br />

virtues.<br />

The ideal gift is that which is totally gratuitous, but we,<br />

being finite and sinful creatures cannot achieve such gratuity.<br />

Only God is capable of that; only God made man is capable of<br />

the ideal human act of gratuitous giving. That is, only one, Jesus<br />

Christ, can carry out the ideal act. We can seek only to approximate<br />

to that ideal of gratuitousness. It is in terms of receiving<br />

and giving, that we make sense of our moral relationships.<br />

The fundamental purpose of giving is to enable others to<br />

become receivers and givers of gifts: the fundamental purpose of<br />

receiving it to become capable of giving. To become a “self” is to<br />

become a giver and receiver in relationship to others; selfhood<br />

means giving self, but in giving we receive our “self,” as “recompense”<br />

in becoming receivers and thus givers. Gratuitous giving

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!