04.07.2015 Views

INFORME FINAL DEL PRECESAM - El Colegio de México

INFORME FINAL DEL PRECESAM - El Colegio de México

INFORME FINAL DEL PRECESAM - El Colegio de México

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A comparison of data from the two survey rounds reveals that the beginning of<br />

the millennium was marked by significant changes in the structure of Mexico’s<br />

rural economies. The ENHRUM data indicate that the economy of rural Mexico<br />

is gradually becoming less oriented around staple production and domestic wage<br />

work (including internal migration), while the role of international migration,<br />

nonstaple crop production, and livestock is increasing.<br />

There was an 8.6 point <strong>de</strong>crease in the percentage of households participating in<br />

internal migration, a 7.7 point <strong>de</strong>crease in nonagricultural wage labor, a 6.9 point<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease in agricultural wage labor, and a 3.4 point <strong>de</strong>crease in participation in<br />

staple production. Participation in livestock production increased 8.8 percentage<br />

points, international migration by 3.5 points, and nonstaple crop production, by<br />

0.9 points.<br />

Mexico’s rural household economies are highly diversified. Households<br />

participate in multiple activities. For example, of the households that participated<br />

in staple production in 2007, 46% also grew other crops, 85% also had livestock,<br />

and 30% had at least one migrant in the United States. Of households with<br />

migrants in the United States, 37% grew staples and 62% participated in<br />

livestock production. This diversity is basic to rural households’ survival<br />

strategies, because it cushions families against shocks affecting particular<br />

income sources, like crop failure. Our preliminary work using the new survey<br />

data suggests that, instead of becoming more specialized, rural households are<br />

becoming slightly more diversified over time.<br />

What impact have these changes had on the welfare of Mexico’s rural<br />

households? How have rural households’ strategies enabled them to survive in<br />

an increasingly global and dynamic economic environment? Does diversification<br />

protect poor households against economic shocks? Have some households<br />

managed to escape from poverty, and if so, how? Or are rural Mexican<br />

households caught in a “poverty trap,” from which they are unable to escape over<br />

time? How have Mexico’s rural policies, in particular PROCAMPO,<br />

OPORTUNIDADES, and INGRESO OBJETIVO, affected poverty? These<br />

questions will be the main focus of our collaborative research during the coming<br />

year.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!